David Kligerman opposes USPS ballot screening

David KligermanSenior vice president and special counsel, Whistleblower Aid

David Kligerman criticized the program's development and warned that implementation flaws could disrupt the election.

“this reckless, slapdash effort”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Blumenthal and Kligerman statements on USPS ballot screeningBlumenthal's attributed quotation; Kligerman's attributed quotation
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Blumenthal and Kligerman statements on USPS ballot screening (opens in a new tab)Blumenthal's attributed quotation; Kligerman's attributed quotation

About this source

Contains statements by Richard Blumenthal, David Kligerman about usps ballot screening.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Trump's ballot-mail order and USPS's proposed screening requirements prompted objections about their legality and implementation before the 2026 midterms.

After the quotation

Kligerman represented the whistleblower and argued that implementation errors could jeopardize the election.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

David Kligerman argues against USPS ballot screening. Kligerman represented the whistleblower and argued that implementation errors could jeopardize the election.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: David Kligerman, David Kligerman opposes USPS ballot screeningDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
David Kligerman opposes USPS ballot screening
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4119-david-kligerman-criticized-the-program-s-development-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "David Kligerman opposes USPS ballot screening". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4119-david-kligerman-criticized-the-program-s-development-and