Robert Vick's campaign says Tennessee communities should decide on license plate readers locally

Robert VickIndependent candidate for governor of Tennessee, in an emailed statement from his campaign

Robert Vick's campaign for Tennessee governor told Dispute Index by email that there is no one-size-fits-all answer from top-down government on license plate readers and AI in public safety. It said local leaders, law enforcement and citizens should have the final say on whether to use the systems, how they are used and what safeguards apply.

“Every city, town, and county in Tennessee has unique safety needs, values, and budgets. Local leaders, law enforcement, and citizens should have the final say on whether to implement these systems, how they are used, and what safeguards are put in place to respect individual dignity and privacy.”

Emailed statement

Read the full email
When it comes to technology like automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and artificial intelligence in public safety, there is no one-size-fits-all answer from top-down government. The balance between public safety and personal privacy is best determined at the local level by the people who live in those communities. Every city, town, and county in Tennessee has unique safety needs, values, and budgets. Local leaders, law enforcement, and citizens should have the final say on whether to implement these systems, how they are used, and what safeguards are put in place to respect individual dignity and privacy.
Emailed statement from Robert Vick's campaign to Dispute Index on license plate readersEmailed statement from the Robert Vick campaign, September 30, 2026.
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Emailed statement

Emailed statement from Robert Vick's campaign to Dispute Index on license plate readers
When it comes to technology like automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and artificial intelligence in public safety, there is no one-size-fits-all answer from top-down government. The balance between public safety and personal privacy is best determined at the local level by the people who live in those communities. Every city, town, and county in Tennessee has unique safety needs, values, and budgets. Local leaders, law enforcement, and citizens should have the final say on whether to implement these systems, how they are used, and what safeguards are put in place to respect individual dignity and privacy.
Emailed statement from the Robert Vick campaign, September 30, 2026.

About this source

Robert Vick's campaign sent this unsigned statement by email from its [email protected] address in reply to a Dispute Index request about license plate readers. The link is to his campaign website; the statement itself is not published there.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Dispute Index asked Vick where he stands on Flock-style license plate readers. His campaign replied by email that there is "no one-size-fits-all answer from top-down government" and that the balance between public safety and privacy "is best determined at the local level by the people who live in those communities."

After the quotation

The email ends with this paragraph and is unsigned.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. The campaign neither supports nor opposes the systems and leaves adoption, use and safeguards to each community, so we labeled it Mixed or conditional. Local choice with safeguards fits the Guardrails step.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed

Nicholas Gluba

“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”
Read statement

Brandenburg opposes Flock-style camera networks in Michigan

Donna Brandenburg

“I, Donna Brandenburg, oppose Flock and all 3rd party - Flock-style license plate camera networks in Michigan. Tracking the movements of law-abiding citizens without a warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Michigan Constitution, which expressly protects 'electronic data and electronic communications.' As governor, I would end state participation in these surveillance networks, require a warrant based on probable cause before any data is collected or accessed, and order existing data on innocent drivers destroyed.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Robert Vick, Robert Vick's campaign says Tennessee communities should decide on license plate readers locallyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Robert Vick's campaign says Tennessee communities should decide on license plate readers locally
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3918-robert-vick-s-campaign-for-tennessee-governor-told

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Robert Vick's campaign says Tennessee communities should decide on license plate readers locally". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3918-robert-vick-s-campaign-for-tennessee-governor-told