Merkley criticizes the objection to his bill

U.S. senator from Oregon and co-lead of the bill

“a colleague objected to this common-sense bill”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senate Blocks Merkley, Murkowski Bill to Prevent Trump Tearing Down Presidential Memorials · Jeff MerkleyFirst paragraph of the senator's quoted statement
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Senate Daily Press floor log, September 28, 202610:26 p.m. floor entry

Source and context

Official statement

Senate Blocks Merkley, Murkowski Bill to Prevent Trump Tearing Down Presidential Memorials (opens in a new tab) · Jeff MerkleyFirst paragraph of the senator's quoted statement

About this source

Press release on Sen. Merkley's official website, dated September 28, 2026. It gives his statement after Sen. Mike Lee blocked his request to pass the Protecting Presidential Memorials Act by unanimous consent.

Original text

Senate Daily Press floor log, September 28, 2026 (opens in a new tab)10:26 p.m. floor entry

About this source

The Senate floor log records Merkley's unanimous-consent request for the memorial-demolition bill and Lee's objection. It also records a separate objection to an arch-project bill.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Merkley sought unanimous consent to pass the one-page bill and Lee objected.

After the quotation

Merkley's official statement defended requiring congressional approval before demolition of presidential memorials and criticized Lee's objection.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Was Mike Lee right to block fast-track passage of the Kennedy Center protection bill?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Merkley described the objection as unfortunate and the blocked bill as common-sense. His response rejects Lee's floor action.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Mike Lee
Sen. Mike Lee beside a September 2026 photograph of the barricaded Kennedy Center.
Credit: U.S. Senate; G. Edward Johnson

More from this case

Read the full case