Darline Graham says "How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn't even have in his possession?"

Darline GrahamU.S. senator from South Carolina and younger sister of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham, who died in July 2026

Condemned

Sen. Darline Graham's remarks and questions to former special counsel Jack Smith at the Senate Judiciary Committee's Sept. 29, 2026 hearing.

Excerpt from 3:35:43 to 3:43:23 of the committee's archived hearing video. DI added its logo in the corner.

Video: U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Public domain (U.S. government work) (opens in a new tab)

Watch the full original video (opens in a new tab) (relevant passage: Sen. Darline Graham's remarks and questions to Smith, about 3:35:46 to 3:43:21 on the archived video timeline)

Watch this clip on its own page

Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) told Smith that his office secured a subpoena in May 2023 for the phone records of her brother, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and that her brother was kept in the dark. She asked how he could have tampered with evidence that Verizon, not he, held.

“In May 2023, your office secured a subpoena for the phone records of my brother, Lindsey. ... Lindsey was kept in the dark, as were several senators you targeted. ... How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn't even have in his possession?”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters (hearing video) · Senate Committee on the JudiciarySen. Darline Graham's remarks and questions to Smith, about 3:35:46 to 3:43:21 on the archived video timeline

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Sen. Lindsey Graham dies at 71 from aortic dissection, according to medical examiner's preliminary findings · CBS NewsArticle, first paragraph and biography section (sister Darline)

Case updates

Following the fight over members' phone records in Arctic Frost?

Get an email if Blackburn's lawsuit or Hagerty's bar complaint produces a ruling, if the Senate acts on subpoena-notice rules, or if Smith responds.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The Hart Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., photographed from across a street on a clear day.
Credit: Architect of the Capitol

Where this statement fits

Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?

On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled "Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters," with former special counsel Jack Smith as its only witness. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and other Republicans said that Smith's team, in the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation and its own election case, obtained members of Congress's phone toll records and text messages, used nondisclosure orders to keep members from learning of it, and breached the Speech or Debate Clause. Smith said the toll records were non-content records obtained after he directed his staff to consult the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, and that the nondisclosure orders were consistent with the law and Justice Department policy at the time. Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) called the attacks on Smith "petty, personal, and political." The sides and the documents give different counts of the members affected. The dispute is whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original video

Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters (hearing video) (opens in a new tab) · Senate Committee on the JudiciarySen. Darline Graham's remarks and questions to Smith, about 3:35:46 to 3:43:21 on the archived video timeline

About this source

Senate Judiciary Committee's archived video of the September 29, 2026 hearing. Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) said Smith's office had secured a subpoena for the phone records of her brother, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and questioned the nondisclosure order; Smith answered that Lindsey Graham was not a target of the investigation.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Watch the clip from this source at the top of the page.

Reporting

Sen. Lindsey Graham dies at 71 from aortic dissection, according to medical examiner's preliminary findings (opens in a new tab) · CBS NewsArticle, first paragraph and biography section (sister Darline)

About this source

CBS News report on Sen. Lindsey Graham's death on a Saturday evening in July 2026. It also identifies Darline as his younger sister.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), who was presiding, called on Graham after saying he would soon have to leave. She said Smith's investigation had reached into the Senate through the subpoena for her brother's records.

After the quotation

Smith replied that her brother "was a patriotic public servant," was not a target of the investigation and likely would have been a witness in the case. Asked why the order said disclosure could lead to tampering with evidence, Smith said disclosure "could result in Donald Trump attempting to intimidate witnesses as he had before and after," and that his office had "an ample basis for that."

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case asks whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper. Graham criticized the subpoena for her brother's records and the nondisclosure order that kept him unaware of it, asking how he could have tampered with evidence held by Verizon. That rejects the collection as improper, so we labeled it Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Darline Graham, Darline Graham says "How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn't even have in his possession?"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Darline Graham says "How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn't even have in his possession?"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3345-sen-darline-graham-r-sc-told-smith-that

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Darline Graham says "How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn't even have in his possession?"". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3345-sen-darline-graham-r-sc-told-smith-that