Kaul says the Legislature should set rules for Flock cameras

Wisconsin attorney general (D) running for reelection

“There hasn’t been the kind of robust discussion or debate in the public forum where it should be happening, which is in our Legislature”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Kaul calls for lawmakers to enact Flock camera guardrailsThird paragraph of the article

Source and context

Reporting

Kaul calls for lawmakers to enact Flock camera guardrails (opens in a new tab)Third paragraph of the article

About this source

WisPolitics report on Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul's remarks on Flock cameras and other issues at a Milwaukee Press Club luncheon.

Before the quotation

Speaking at a Milwaukee Press Club, WisPolitics and Milwaukee Rotary luncheon, Kaul called for state lawmakers to set standards for how police use automated license-plate readers, according to WisPolitics.

After the quotation

WisPolitics reports Kaul suggested regular audits of system use and limits on who can access the system and the types of cases it can be used for. He also said he did not see any reason offhand why private contractors should have access to the information, except for police subcontractors.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Kaul said the Legislature should debate the systems, and WisPolitics reports he called for guardrails such as audits and limits on who can use them and for which cases, while questioning private contractor access. He supports continued use under legal limits, so Mixed or conditional fits.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement