Ferguson welcomes changes but seeks judicial checks

Andrew Guthrie FergusonGeorge Washington University law professor

Mixed or conditional

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson called Flock's changes an improvement but said their adequacy depends on public rulemaking and judicial checks.

Responding to

Flock's August 2026 safeguards meaningfully address privacy and misuse concerns about its license-plate reader network.

“sustained democratic engagement with the rules and judicial checks on access at a minimum”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)AP interviews critics and experts about Flock's safeguardsCritics say updates still leave room for abuses

Case updates

Do Flock's new safeguards answer the ACLU's concerns?

Get an email if Flock rolls out its remaining controls or changes its retention terms, or if the ACLU or police customers report how the safeguards work in practice.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Graphic comparing Flock Safety's old 30-day data-retention default with its new seven-day default.
Credit: Flock Safety

Where this statement fits

Did Flock Safety's August 2026 privacy safeguards address concerns about its camera network?

Flock Safety announced new controls for its license-plate reader network on August 13, 2026. The ACLU said a shorter default retention period might help but argued that the broader package left major privacy risks unresolved. The dispute concerns the adequacy of Flock's safeguards, not whether the company announced them.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

AP interviews critics and experts about Flock's safeguards (opens in a new tab)Critics say updates still leave room for abuses

About this source

Original AP interviews include Robert Frommer and Andrew Guthrie Ferguson's separate assessments of Flock's announced privacy changes.

Before the quotation

AP interviewed Ferguson after Flock announced the changes.

After the quotation

He described the revisions as better than no changes but urged continued scrutiny.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The adequacy of the August safeguards is at issue. Ferguson credits the changes while calling for additional oversight.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, Ferguson welcomes changes but seeks judicial checksDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ferguson welcomes changes but seeks judicial checks
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2940-andrew-guthrie-ferguson-called-flock-s-changes-an

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ferguson welcomes changes but seeks judicial checks". First published: 2026-09-28. Last updated: 2026-09-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/2940-andrew-guthrie-ferguson-called-flock-s-changes-an