Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs opposes the USPS proposed ballot-mail rule

Steve HobbsWashington Secretary of State, submitting comments to the U.S. Postal Service

Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs told the Postal Service that he opposes its proposed ballot-mail rule, calling both the rule and the executive order behind it unconstitutional intrusions on state authority over elections. He said there is insufficient time to implement the rule and that USPS should withdraw it.

“I oppose USPS’s proposed rule for handling ballot mail in federal elections in alignment with Executive Order 14399 regarding elections. There are several reasons the proposed rule is unnecessary and unconstitutional. The executive order on which this proposed rule is based and the proposed rule itself are unconstitutional intrusions on state authority over elections and also violate the constitutional separation of powers. A court recently agreed that the executive order’s directions to USPS were unlawful, and the USPS has no constitutional authority to interfere with state regulation of the time, place, and manner of holding elections. The court specifically forbid the USPS from proposing or implementing rules outlined in the executive order for the November 3, 2026 election and all earlier elections. The USPS should withdraw the proposed rule. To start, there is insufficient time to implement the rule, which would be a financial burden on an electoral system that currently functions well despite limited resources.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Secretary of State Steve Hobbs' comments on USPS proposed ballot ruleOpening paragraphs of the comments, from 'I oppose USPS's proposed rule' through 'To start, there is insufficient time to implement the rule', page dated June 26, 2026
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Secretary of State Steve Hobbs' comments on USPS proposed ballot rule (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraphs of the comments, from 'I oppose USPS's proposed rule' through 'To start, there is insufficient time to implement the rule', page dated June 26, 2026

About this source

The Washington Secretary of State's posting of the comments Hobbs submitted to the Postal Service on its proposed ballot-mail rule.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Hobbs submitted the comments in response to the Postal Service's proposal titled Ballot Mail for Federal Elections, noticed on May 29, 2026. His comments address the proposed version of the rule and its link to Executive Order 14399.

After the quotation

Hobbs also wrote that many Washington counties had already prepared their 2026 general election ballot envelopes and that the rule's unique barcode requirement could mean they cannot use the envelopes they bought.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is implementing the mandatory USPS ballot-mail requirements for the 2026 election. Hobbs says he opposes the proposed rule, calls it and the executive order behind it unconstitutional intrusions on state authority, says there is insufficient time to implement it, and asks USPS to withdraw it. That rejects the requirements outright, so we labeled it Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Donald Trump, United States Postal Service

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Steve Hobbs, Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs opposes the USPS proposed ballot-mail ruleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs opposes the USPS proposed ballot-mail rule
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2828-washington-secretary-of-state-steve-hobbs-told-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs opposes the USPS proposed ballot-mail rule". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2828-washington-secretary-of-state-steve-hobbs-told-the