ICE says the driver rammed an ICE vehicle before an officer discharged his weapon
Federal immigration-enforcement agency, statement issued through a spokesperson
“At approximately 6:15AM, the criminal illegal alien weaponized his car and rammed an ICE law enforcement vehicle. The illegal alien then dangerously drove on the wrong direction on a one-way street and crashed into a civilian vehicle. During the incident, an ICE officer discharged his weapon and one ICE officer sustained a cut to his hand.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
FOX43 reproduces the full statement an ICE spokesperson issued on the afternoon of July 1, 2026. It also reports that a Harrisburg police captain said the department had no involvement in the shooting or the investigation, which the FBI was handling.
Reporting
About this source
PennLive's same-day report on ICE's account of the July 1 shooting. It quotes the FBI's emailed statement, reports that Mayor Wanda Williams and City Council President Danielle Hill declined to comment, and says PennLive could not immediately verify the criminal history ICE cited.
Reporting
About this source
PennLive describes surveillance footage it obtained of the July 1 stop and compares it with ICE's statement that the driver rammed an ICE vehicle. PennLive reports that ICE did not immediately respond to questions about the footage.
Before the quotation
Harrisburg police said they were not involved in the shooting or the investigation, and the FBI was investigating.
After the quotation
ICE said Lara-Hernandez remained at large. On July 2, PennLive reported that ICE did not immediately respond to questions about the surveillance footage.
How this statement is classified
Responding to: ICE said Clemente Lara-Hernandez weaponized his car and rammed an ICE law enforcement vehicle during a targeted vehicle stop, and that an ICE officer discharged his weapon during the incident.
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the officer's decision to fire. The statement offers the alleged ramming of an ICE vehicle as the circumstance in which the officer discharged his weapon, which frames the shot as a response to a vehicle attack. It does not state a conclusion about the shot itself, so the label rests on that framing.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Was the ICE officer justified in firing at a driver during a Harrisburg vehicle stop?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Was anybody at risk of serious physical injury or death? And the answer is no ... I don’t think there’s a need for deadly physical force in that situation.”Read statement
“He takes a little sideswipe damage, but he doesn’t ram his way out of that, by any means. ... If you’re saying that the officers are firing because the car was trying to run them over, then they’d be firing at the car as it was heading towards them, not speeding away from them”Read statement
“Recently our neighborhood was traumatized by the acts of ICE agents firing rounds at an individual in the city. ... To the families traumatized due to these actions, I say to you we are truly apologetic and stand with you.”Read statement