Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)
Mike CrapoU.S. Senator, Idaho
Mike Crapo voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Do they support the war in Iran?
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 congressional candidates stand on continued U.S. military operations against Iran, based on their votes, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Official Senate roll call on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Rejected 49-50 on September 24, 2026. Fetterman was the only Democratic nay; Republicans Collins, Murkowski, Paul and Tillis voted yea; Alsobrooks did not vote.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
On September 24, 2026, the Senate voted on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. The House had adopted the resolution 214-208 on July 23, 2026. The Senate rejected it 49-50.
After the quotation
Because H.Con.Res. 89 is a concurrent resolution, it would not have been presented to the President even if it had passed the Senate.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseRobert Murray says he would vote for a war powers resolution on Iran based on public information
“Yes. Compelling classified intelligence of a just cause or an imminent threat would change my vote. However, with only access to public information, I would vote for a war powers resolution directing a U.S. ceasefire against Iran until Congress declares war.”Read statement
Ricardo Cabrera's campaign says he would vote to remove U.S. forces from a conflict zone only after the mission is won
“Mr. Cabrera would only vote for the removal of American forces from a conflict zone after we have won and fully completed our mission.”Read statement
Eric Hafner says he opposes the current Iran involvement and that the U.S. must stop arming Israel
“I oppose the current Iran involvement. We must honor our nation's commitment to our stated neutrality policy. We must immediately stop arming Israel. In arming Israel, we are aiding in the killing and injuring of innocent Palestinian families and destroying their country. We must stop being part of Israel's war actions.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2454-mike-crapo-voted-nay-on-h-con-res
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)". First published: 2026-09-25. Last updated: 2026-09-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/2454-mike-crapo-voted-nay-on-h-con-res