Cynthia Santiago condemns the shooting

Cynthia SantiagoAttorney for Carlos Jimenez

Condemned

Santiago argued that Jimenez was trying to leave a frightening encounter and that the agents’ approach and use of deadly force were unjustified.

“Then there was a shot from the side, back passenger window, to the car. Use of deadly force is to be used as a last resort. Coming out to communities with guns drawn is the opposite.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)U.S. citizen shot from behind as he warned ICE agents about children gathering at bus stop, lawyers say

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Lawyers for US citizen shot by ICE agent say shooting was not self-defenseParagraphs 5-12

Case updates

What happens next in Carlos Jimenez's case?

Get an email if prosecutors move to dismiss Jimenez's charge after diversion, or if new evidence about the shooting is filed or released.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Carlos Jimenez standing at a polling place with his arm in a sling after being shot by an immigration agent.
Credit: The Simon Law Group via Noticias Telemundo

Where this statement fits

Was ICE Officer Eusebio Ortiz justified in shooting Carlos Jimenez?

On October 30, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation officer Eusebio Ortiz fired a shot that struck U.S. citizen Carlos Jimenez in the shoulder during an immigration enforcement operation in Ontario, California. A federal complaint alleged that Jimenez rapidly reversed his Lexus toward a Customs and Border Protection officer and a stopped Honda, causing the officer to fear a collision. Jimenez's attorneys said he was maneuvering away after warning agents that schoolchildren would soon arrive at a nearby bus stop, and that the bullet entered through the rear passenger window and struck his back shoulder. A federal court later ordered production of officer communications and use-of-force policies. The parties then entered a diversion agreement under which prosecutors may seek dismissal with prejudice after October 31, 2026. The dispute is whether Jimenez's vehicle posed an imminent threat when Ortiz fired.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

U.S. citizen shot from behind as he warned ICE agents about children gathering at bus stop, lawyers say (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Los Angeles Times follow-up reporting presenting the account and legal assessment of Carlos Jimenez’s attorneys Cynthia Santiago and Robert Simon.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Lawyers for US citizen shot by ICE agent say shooting was not self-defense (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs 5-12

About this source

ABC News reports the competing government and defense accounts. Jimenez's lawyers said he was maneuvering around the officers and leaving after warning about arriving schoolchildren; DHS said the officer fired defensive shots while fearing for his life.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Santiago said Jimenez became afraid after a masked agent drew a gun and shook pepper spray at him.

After the quotation

She later described the episode as horrendous and blamed inadequate training and escalating violence in the community.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She explicitly contrasts the shooting with the last-resort standard for deadly force and criticizes the agents’ armed approach.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Greg Jackson calls the Jimenez shooting unlawful

Greg Jackson

“their agreement to dismiss with prejudice bolsters our own argument that the shooting itself was unlawful and the charges against Mr. Jimenez entirely fabricated and baseless. The shooter, Agent Ortiz, violated department policy by firing his weapon at a moving vehicle, and Mr. Jimenez was in fact complying with Mr. Ortiz’s orders to drive away when Mr. Ortiz tried to murder him and shot him anyway.”
Read statement

Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improper

Chad Pennington

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”
Read statement

Ayah Sarsour calls Ortiz’s force improper

Ayah A. Sarsour

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Cynthia Santiago, Cynthia Santiago condemns the shootingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Cynthia Santiago condemns the shooting
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1475-santiago-argued-that-jimenez-was-trying-to-leave

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Cynthia Santiago condemns the shooting". First published: 2026-09-22. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1475-santiago-argued-that-jimenez-was-trying-to-leave