Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improper

Chad PenningtonSupervising deputy federal public defender for Carlos Jimenez

Condemned

Pennington joined a defense filing that called the traffic stop aggressive and Ortiz’s use of near-lethal force improper.

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Carlos Jimenez motion to compel government witness files and communicationsCase 5:25-cr-00366-KK, Document 53, pages 6-10 and 17-18

Case updates

What happens next in Carlos Jimenez's case?

Get an email if prosecutors move to dismiss Jimenez's charge after diversion, or if new evidence about the shooting is filed or released.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Carlos Jimenez standing at a polling place with his arm in a sling after being shot by an immigration agent.
Credit: The Simon Law Group via Noticias Telemundo

Where this statement fits

Was ICE Officer Eusebio Ortiz justified in shooting Carlos Jimenez?

On October 30, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation officer Eusebio Ortiz fired a shot that struck U.S. citizen Carlos Jimenez in the shoulder during an immigration enforcement operation in Ontario, California. A federal complaint alleged that Jimenez rapidly reversed his Lexus toward a Customs and Border Protection officer and a stopped Honda, causing the officer to fear a collision. Jimenez's attorneys said he was maneuvering away after warning agents that schoolchildren would soon arrive at a nearby bus stop, and that the bullet entered through the rear passenger window and struck his back shoulder. A federal court later ordered production of officer communications and use-of-force policies. The parties then entered a diversion agreement under which prosecutors may seek dismissal with prejudice after October 31, 2026. The dispute is whether Jimenez's vehicle posed an imminent threat when Ortiz fired.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Carlos Jimenez motion to compel government witness files and communications (opens in a new tab)Case 5:25-cr-00366-KK, Document 53, pages 6-10 and 17-18

About this source

Defense motion identifying Ortiz as the shooter and describing discovery disputes, including the unrecorded delayed interview of Ortiz, claimed missing communications and the asserted absence of body-worn or dash-camera footage. The allegations about discovery are advocacy positions unless adopted by the court.

Before the quotation

Jimenez’s defense sought government witness personnel records and communications relevant to the shooting and prosecution.

After the quotation

The motion argued that Ortiz may have used excessive force and that Jimenez acted appropriately.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

As a signatory to the filing, he directly condemns the tactics and force used in the encounter.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Greg Jackson calls the Jimenez shooting unlawful

Greg Jackson

“their agreement to dismiss with prejudice bolsters our own argument that the shooting itself was unlawful and the charges against Mr. Jimenez entirely fabricated and baseless. The shooter, Agent Ortiz, violated department policy by firing his weapon at a moving vehicle, and Mr. Jimenez was in fact complying with Mr. Ortiz’s orders to drive away when Mr. Ortiz tried to murder him and shot him anyway.”
Read statement

Ayah Sarsour calls Ortiz’s force improper

Ayah A. Sarsour

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Chad Pennington, Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improperDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improper
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1478-pennington-joined-a-defense-filing-that-called-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improper". First published: 2026-09-22. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1478-pennington-joined-a-defense-filing-that-called-the