Ayah Sarsour calls Ortiz’s force improper

Deputy federal public defender for Carlos Jimenez

This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Carlos Jimenez motion to compel government witness files and communicationsCase 5:25-cr-00366-KK, Document 53, pages 6-10 and 17-18

Source and context

Original text

Carlos Jimenez motion to compel government witness files and communications (opens in a new tab)Case 5:25-cr-00366-KK, Document 53, pages 6-10 and 17-18

About this source

Defense motion identifying Ortiz as the shooter and describing discovery disputes, including the unrecorded delayed interview of Ortiz, claimed missing communications and the asserted absence of body-worn or dash-camera footage. The allegations about discovery are advocacy positions unless adopted by the court.

Before the quotation

Jimenez’s defense sought government witness personnel records and communications relevant to the shooting and prosecution.

After the quotation

The motion argued that Ortiz may have used excessive force and that Jimenez acted appropriately.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Was ICE Officer Eusebio Ortiz justified in shooting Carlos Jimenez?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The filing directly condemns the tactics and force used in the encounter.

Recorded on
Published here
Carlos Jimenez standing at a polling place with his arm in a sling after being shot by an immigration agent.
Credit: The Simon Law Group via Noticias Telemundo

More from this case

Read the full case

Greg Jackson

Their agreement to dismiss with prejudice bolsters our own argument that the shooting itself was unlawful and the charges against Mr. Jimenez entirely fabricated and baseless. The shooter, Agent Ortiz, violated department policy by firing his weapon at a moving vehicle, and Mr. Jimenez was in fact complying with Mr. Ortiz’s orders to drive away when Mr. Ortiz tried to murder him and shot him anyway.
Read statement

Chad Pennington

This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.
Read statement