Norma Torres challenges DHS’s account

Norma TorresU.S. representative for California

Challenged the characterization

Torres said DHS’s version could not be accepted at face value and demanded release of the evidence needed to evaluate the shooting.

“There must be a full, transparent investigation with immediate updates. As we’ve seen in numerous incidents over the past several months, statements from the Department cannot be taken at face value. Witness statements, body-camera footage, security footage, and all relevant information must be released so the public can judge for themselves what really happened. Accountability is not optional; it is demanded.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)2 California ICE shootings in nine days: Latest confrontation leaves bloody scene

Case updates

What happens next in Carlos Jimenez's case?

Get an email if prosecutors move to dismiss Jimenez's charge after diversion, or if new evidence about the shooting is filed or released.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Norma Torres in this case

Every statement by Norma Torres
Carlos Jimenez standing at a polling place with his arm in a sling after being shot by an immigration agent.
Credit: The Simon Law Group via Noticias Telemundo

Where this statement fits

Was ICE Officer Eusebio Ortiz justified in shooting Carlos Jimenez?

On October 30, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation officer Eusebio Ortiz fired a shot that struck U.S. citizen Carlos Jimenez in the shoulder during an immigration enforcement operation in Ontario, California. A federal complaint alleged that Jimenez rapidly reversed his Lexus toward a Customs and Border Protection officer and a stopped Honda, causing the officer to fear a collision. Jimenez's attorneys said he was maneuvering away after warning agents that schoolchildren would soon arrive at a nearby bus stop, and that the bullet entered through the rear passenger window and struck his back shoulder. A federal court later ordered production of officer communications and use-of-force policies. The parties then entered a diversion agreement under which prosecutors may seek dismissal with prejudice after October 31, 2026. The dispute is whether Jimenez's vehicle posed an imminent threat when Ortiz fired.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

2 California ICE shootings in nine days: Latest confrontation leaves bloody scene (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Contemporaneous Los Angeles Times reporting on the Ontario shooting, including statements from DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin and Rep. Norma Torres.

Before the quotation

DHS said Jimenez had reversed his car directly at officers, prompting defensive gunfire.

After the quotation

Torres asked for witness accounts, body-camera footage, security video and other evidence to be made public.

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She directly disputes the reliability of the government’s justification but stops short of reaching a final judgment on whether the shooting was justified.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Greg Jackson calls the Jimenez shooting unlawful

Greg Jackson

“their agreement to dismiss with prejudice bolsters our own argument that the shooting itself was unlawful and the charges against Mr. Jimenez entirely fabricated and baseless. The shooter, Agent Ortiz, violated department policy by firing his weapon at a moving vehicle, and Mr. Jimenez was in fact complying with Mr. Ortiz’s orders to drive away when Mr. Ortiz tried to murder him and shot him anyway.”
Read statement

Chad Pennington calls Ortiz’s force improper

Chad Pennington

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”
Read statement

Ayah Sarsour calls Ortiz’s force improper

Ayah A. Sarsour

“This case is yet another matter stemming from an aggressive ICE traffic stop and interaction with the public that resulted in catastrophic consequences and the subsequent filing of an unsupportable criminal charge. Indeed, this case fits a recent and endemic national pattern of ICE using aggressive traffic stop techniques and then employing the improper use of near-lethal force against an American citizen.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Norma Torres, Norma Torres challenges DHS’s accountDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Norma Torres challenges DHS’s account
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1474-torres-said-dhs-s-version-could-not-be

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Norma Torres challenges DHS’s account". First published: 2026-09-22. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1474-torres-said-dhs-s-version-could-not-be