Krasner tells the court he and his supervisors "acted with integrity"

Larry KrasnerDistrict Attorney of Philadelphia

Challenged the characterization

In an October 9 court filing supporting his motion to remove Judge Diamond from the case, Krasner said he and his supervisory assistants, whom the filing names as including Katherine Ernst and Steven Wildberger, acted with integrity in seeking to withdraw the office's erroneous brief.

Responding to

Krasner and Stiegler pressured Conviction Integrity Unit prosecutors to blame a departed colleague for errors and to present a false narrative to the court about the DAO's internal handling of Dennis Johnson's habeas petition -- conduct that "is tantamount to a prima facie showing" of false statements, false declarations under oath, perjury, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy.

“DA Krasner and his supervisory assistants acted with integrity in seeking to withdraw the erroneous brief, correct the errors, and change position to oppose a new trial”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Reply in Support of Motion for Recusal, Johnson v. Nickelson, No. 2:15-cv-04965-PD (E.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2026)Doc. 181, pp. 1-2 and n.1

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Two Philadelphia prosecutors resign after dispute with Krasner · The Philadelphia InquirerParagraphs beginning: Two assistant district attorneys; resignation effective late Tuesday

Case updates

What happens next with the judge's findings on Larry Krasner?

Get an email if Judge Diamond rules on the reconsideration or recusal motions, if federal prosecutors act on the referral, or if Krasner appeals.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Larry Krasner in this case

Every statement by Larry Krasner
Larry Krasner
Credit: Michael Candelori

Where this statement fits

Did Larry Krasner Pressure Staff to Mislead a Federal Judge About a Murder-Conviction Appeal?

A federal judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner and Matthew Stiegler, chief of his office's Conviction Integrity Unit, may have pressured subordinate prosecutors to blame a departed colleague and present a false account to the court about an internal dispute over a 2022 concession in a habeas corpus case, and referred Krasner, Stiegler, and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office for investigation. Krasner disputes the judge's findings and says he will appeal.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Reply in Support of Motion for Recusal, Johnson v. Nickelson, No. 2:15-cv-04965-PD (E.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2026) (opens in a new tab)Doc. 181, pp. 1-2 and n.1

About this source

Reply in support of the District Attorney's Office's motion asking Judge Paul S. Diamond to recuse, filed October 9, 2026 and signed by District Attorney Lawrence S. Krasner and Assistant District Attorney Thomas Gaeta. Footnote 1 names the supervisory assistants as Katherine Ernst, Steven Wildberger, David Napiorski and Peter Andrews. Read in full from the CourtListener (RECAP) copy.

Reporting

Two Philadelphia prosecutors resign after dispute with Krasner (opens in a new tab) · The Philadelphia InquirerParagraphs beginning: Two assistant district attorneys; resignation effective late Tuesday

About this source

Original reporting on Katherine Ernst and Steven Wildberger resigning late October 6 after Krasner declined their requested changes to filings.

Before the quotation

From the District Attorney's Office's October 9, 2026 reply in support of its motion asking Judge Diamond to recuse, signed by Krasner and Assistant District Attorney Thomas Gaeta. A footnote names the supervisory assistants as Katherine Ernst, Steven Wildberger, David Napiorski and Peter Andrews. Ernst and Wildberger's resignations had taken effect late on October 6, after Krasner declined to change how his filings described them.

After the quotation

The sentence continues with Krasner's description of the court's finding: that considering a review of Jaclyn Mason's other work for errors warrants a criminal investigation. In an email reply to Ernst and Wildberger's memo, Krasner had accused them of insubordination.

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the conduct under scrutiny, Krasner disputes the court's account by saying he and his supervisors acted with integrity in correcting the erroneous brief. He contests how his conduct is described and does not argue that pressuring staff would be justified, so the label is challenges characterization.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Paul S. Diamond

More from this case

Read the full case

Preib urges scrutiny of prosecutors in Philadelphia and Chicago

Martin Preib

“While the Chicago media refuses to address the blatant parallels between top prosecutors in Philly and Chicago, federal investigators should not refuse to do so. Restoring the criminal justice system, in particular holding police killers accountable, is a central theme of the Trump administration. The feds must do their job not just in Philly, but Chicago as well.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Larry Krasner, Krasner tells the court he and his supervisors "acted with integrity"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Krasner tells the court he and his supervisors "acted with integrity"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5621-in-an-october-9-court-filing-supporting-his

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Krasner tells the court he and his supervisors "acted with integrity"". First published: 2026-10-12. Last updated: 2026-10-12. https://disputeindex.com/events/5621-in-an-october-9-court-filing-supporting-his