Trevor Potter says the Supreme Court decision stops the Postal Service "sowing chaos in our elections"

Trevor PotterPresident of the Campaign Legal Center and former chairman of the Federal Election Commission, posting on his own Bluesky account; his organisation is a party to the litigation

Trevor Potter, president of the Campaign Legal Center and a former Republican chairman of the Federal Election Commission, welcomed the Supreme Court's decision on the mail voting executive order, saying it prevented the Postal Service from sowing chaos in the elections. His organisation is a party to the litigation and had obtained earlier blocks on the order in the district courts; he had also joined an amicus brief for more than 50 former state and federal judges urging the Supreme Court to uphold the lower court ruling.

“Tonight's Supreme Court decision prevents the U.S. Postal Service from sowing chaos in our elections”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Trevor Potter's statement on the Supreme Court blocking the mail voting executive order · Trevor PotterBluesky post by @thetrevorpotter.bsky.social, 2026-09-15 00:23 UTC, the first post of a numbered thread.
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

Trevor Potter's statement on the Supreme Court blocking the mail voting executive order (opens in a new tab) · Trevor PotterBluesky post by @thetrevorpotter.bsky.social, 2026-09-15 00:23 UTC, the first post of a numbered thread.

About this source

The speaker's own post on Bluesky. It opens a numbered thread, so the excerpt is the opening statement rather than his complete argument. Potter's organisation, the Campaign Legal Center, is a party to the litigation; his earlier posts record a preliminary injunction on September 4, a further district court block on September 14, and an amicus brief filed in August on behalf of more than 50 former state and federal judges.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on September 4 blocking the Postal Service from implementing the order, and another judge extended a block on September 14. The Justice Department called the block baseless.

After the quotation

Potter is a Republican appointee who led the Federal Election Commission under President George H. W. Bush, which places this objection outside a purely partisan division on the case.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Potter rejects their application, describing the order elsewhere as illegal and unconstitutional and welcoming the decision that stops the Postal Service implementing it. The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, because his objection is framed in legal terms about the executive's authority rather than about the policy's merits. That loses because he is not disputing how the order has been described; he is opposing its operation and litigating to prevent it.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Donald Trump

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Trevor Potter, Trevor Potter says the Supreme Court decision stops the Postal Service "sowing chaos in our elections"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Trevor Potter says the Supreme Court decision stops the Postal Service "sowing chaos in our elections"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1094-trevor-potter-president-of-the-campaign-legal-center

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Trevor Potter says the Supreme Court decision stops the Postal Service "sowing chaos in our elections"". First published: 2026-09-19. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1094-trevor-potter-president-of-the-campaign-legal-center