JB Pritzker calls for Congress to follow Illinois's lead on mandatory AI audits
Governor of Illinois, posting on his official X account
“Congress needs to get back to work and enact legislation to regulate AI. Last week, a whistleblower inside Anthropic sounded the alarm on the dangers of AI. And even AI industry leaders like Sam Altman and Dario Amodei and Elon Musk admitted that it's time to put guardrails on the development of AI models to prevent extreme risks to human safety. But Donald Trump and JD Vance are doubling down on their policy failure, calling the warnings a hoax. [...] Imposing proper guardrails for AI that protect our nation is a central challenge of this generation. That's why in Illinois, we're leading the way. Long before industry leaders started sounding the alarm, I was proud to enact Illinois' nation-leading Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act. It made Illinois the first in the nation to require mandatory annual independent audits of frontier AI systems. Congress needs to follow Illinois' lead and act now on these and other necessary guardrails. It's time for Republican House Speaker Johnson to call members back into session immediately and rein in the AI industry before it's too late.”
Source and context
Original post
About this source
First-party post from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker's official X account. The attached video is fuller than the caption: Pritzker cites a recent whistleblower report from an AI company and remarks from Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk on AI risk, criticizes Donald Trump and JD Vance for calling AI-safety warnings a hoax, and calls on House Speaker Mike Johnson to recall Congress into session. His claim that Illinois was first to mandate third-party audits of frontier AI systems is corroborated by contemporaneous legal-industry coverage of the state's AI Safety Measures Act (SB 315), signed July 6, 2026.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The House had adjourned early the previous week for a seven-week recess without acting on AI legislation. Governors Shapiro and Pritzker both invoked their own states' AI-safety records in calling for federal action the same week.
After the quotation
Speaker Johnson has separately said AI companies can self-regulate and rejected a moratorium. Illinois's AI Safety Measures Act was signed July 6, 2026, with its third-party audit requirement phasing in by January 2028.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is the proposition that Washington should impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI. Pritzker endorses it directly, holds up Illinois's own audit mandate as the model Congress should follow, and explicitly calls for the House to return to session to legislate. That places him with Jeffries (985), Ansari (988), Crow (995) and Shapiro (1011) in the same week's cluster of Democrats framing the recess as a failure to act on safeguards they support. The closest competing label is condemns, since much of the statement criticizes Trump, Vance and House Republicans; that loses because the criticism is that they have failed to enact safeguards Pritzker endorses, which supports the proposition rather than rejecting it.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Mike Johnson
Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“I joined @RepYassAnsari and more than two dozen @HouseDemocrats in urging Donald Trump to take urgent action to address the serious risks posed by frontier AI.”Read statement
“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world... So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that's a self-serving argument. That isn't true.”Read statement
“AI has enormous potential to drive scientific discovery, strengthen key industries, improve public services, and create new opportunities for businesses and residents across Massachusetts. At the same time, the rapid pace of AI development raises serious concerns about safety, accountability, privacy, civil rights, the future of work, and public trust. We cannot allow this technology to move faster than our ability to put appropriate safeguards in place, and we can't let the responsibility for managing these risks rest with technology companies alone. We need strong action on both the state and federal levels.”Read statement