Xaviaer DuRousseau sues PragerU, alleging discrimination and wrongful termination; PragerU rejects the claims

Former PragerU personality Xaviaer DuRousseau sued PragerU, its CEO Marissa Streit and six other individuals in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging race and sexual-orientation discrimination, a hostile workplace, retaliation and wrongful termination. PragerU says it wholly rejects the claims.

Portrait of Xaviaer DuRousseau
Xaviaer DuRousseau backstage at the Dr. Phil Show in April 2024.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Overview

PragerU describes DuRousseau as a former PragerForce personality. The Post Millennial reports that he now posts his commentary on Instagram and other social media. According to the outlet's account, the complaint also says management received complaints about the colleague's conduct and failed to take meaningful corrective action, that when DuRousseau raised security with Streit she told him that needing it made him a "safety threat to our donors," and that a lead producer sent him a video file showing him being shot, which the complaint calls "eerily similar" to the killing of Charlie Kirk. It says Streit gave him the "cold shoulder" at a Turning Point gala in Washington before the meeting that led to his departure. The court assigned the case to Judge Kristin S. Escalante. As of November 9, 2026, the court's register shows no response from the defendants, and we could not obtain the full complaint.

People in this case

Timeline

3 timeline entries on this page. Dates: November 3, 2026 to November 7, 2026

  1. November 2026

    1. DuRousseau sues PragerU in Los Angeles Superior Court

      Xaviaer DuRousseau files a complaint for damages (No. 26STCV34663) against the Prager University Foundation, CEO Marissa Streit, six other individuals and unnamed defendants. The first page lists causes of action including discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act, negligent hiring, supervision and retention, wrongful termination in violation of public policy and whistleblower retaliation.

      [01]DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summary

      The Los Angeles Superior Court's online case summary for Xaviaer DuRousseau's suit against the Prager University Foundation. It lists the November 3, 2026 filing date, the case type (wrongful termination), the Spring Street Courthouse, the plaintiff and eight defendants, the case's assignment to Judge Kristin S. Escalante in Department 2 and a case management conference set for March 3, 2027. The summary opens from a case number search on the court's website.

      DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summaryCase No. 26STCV34663: case information, parties, documents filed and register of actions, as displayed November 9, 2026
      [02]Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) posts the first page of DuRousseau's complaint against PragerU

      Tony Ortiz of Current Revolt reports the suit and posts an image of the complaint's first page. The page shows the Los Angeles Superior Court's electronic filing stamp of November 3, 2026, case number 26STCV34663, DuRousseau's attorneys at Shegerian & Associates, the defendants and the first eight causes of action, among them discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

      Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) posts the first page of DuRousseau's complaint against PragerUPost text and the attached image of the complaint's first page
      [03]Xaviaer DuRousseau files suit against PragerU over 'hostile work environment,' 'discrimination' after 'wrongful termination'

      The Post Millennial summarizes the allegations in DuRousseau's complaint, quoting it directly, and prints the statement PragerU gave the outlet in response.

    2. Court sets a March 2027 conference as DuRousseau serves PragerU

      The court assigns the case to Judge Kristin S. Escalante in Department 2 of the Spring Street Courthouse on November 4 and on November 5 sets a case management conference for March 3, 2027. On November 6, DuRousseau files proof that PragerU and one individual defendant were personally served.

      [01]DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summary

      The Los Angeles Superior Court's online case summary for Xaviaer DuRousseau's suit against the Prager University Foundation. It lists the November 3, 2026 filing date, the case type (wrongful termination), the Spring Street Courthouse, the plaintiff and eight defendants, the case's assignment to Judge Kristin S. Escalante in Department 2 and a case management conference set for March 3, 2027. The summary opens from a case number search on the court's website.

      DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summaryCase No. 26STCV34663: case information, parties, documents filed and register of actions, as displayed November 9, 2026
    3. PragerU says it wholly rejects DuRousseau's claims

      Reaction

      PragerU posts a statement on its website saying it wholly rejects the claims and does not tolerate discrimination of any kind, and calling the suit "a kind of lawfare aimed at destroying" conservative organizations. The Post Millennial reports the lawsuit the same day and prints the statement.

      [04]PragerU

      PragerU's statement on its website responding to DuRousseau's lawsuit. The page shows no date; PragerU's site map lists it as last updated on November 7, 2026.

      [03]Xaviaer DuRousseau files suit against PragerU over 'hostile work environment,' 'discrimination' after 'wrongful termination'

      The Post Millennial summarizes the allegations in DuRousseau's complaint, quoting it directly, and prints the statement PragerU gave the outlet in response.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

Xaviaer DuRousseau

DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

What is disputed

PragerU says it wholly rejects the claims and does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. The case is pending in Los Angeles Superior Court.

Sources (3)

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

10 responses. First 6 shown initially. Newest first.

  1. Mark MecklerPresident of Convention of States Action, in a post on his X account

    Before this statement

    Meckler opens the post by saying he had read that day that PragerU was being sued and accused of racism and discrimination.

    "PragerU is lead by one of the most amazing, kind, fair and brilliant leaders in America, Marissa Streit. These allegations seem ridiculous on their face based on what I know of the leadership of PragerU. I stand with Marissa, Dennis Prager, and the entire Prager U family."
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    Meckler praises PragerU chief executive Marissa Streit, says the allegations seem ridiculous based on what he knows of PragerU's leadership, and says he stands with Streit, Dennis Prager and PragerU.

    After the statement

    The post tags the X accounts of Streit, Dennis Prager and PragerU.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. Meckler disputes the credibility of those allegations, calling them ridiculous on their face based on what he knows of PragerU's leadership, and vouches for Streit. He does not claim knowledge of the specific events or say they did not happen, so the statement challenges the characterization of PragerU rather than denying the facts.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Kahlil GreeneHistorian and author of the History Can't Hide newsletter, in an essay on Substack

    Before this statement

    Greene writes that DuRousseau told PragerU audiences that racism happened between individuals and that institutions no longer enforced it, and that his lawsuit alleges PragerU managers knew of racist and anti-gay abuse against him and failed to stop it.

    "DuRousseau spent years telling Black audiences that systemic racism was over, and he figured out he was wrong only when it happened to him."
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    In a History Can't Hide essay, Greene argues that the abuse DuRousseau alleges PragerU managers failed to stop is the kind of institutional racism DuRousseau had said no longer existed.

    After the statement

    The essay was published Nov. 9 in Greene's History Can't Hide newsletter.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. Greene describes the alleged failure of PragerU managers to stop racist and anti-gay abuse as institutional racism and writes that it happened to DuRousseau, which treats the alleged conduct as wrongful. Most of the essay criticizes DuRousseau's past views, but its evaluation of the conduct under scrutiny is critical rather than a dispute over how it is described.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Niko HouseHost of the For The People podcast, in a post on X

    Before this statement

    House quotes Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt post reporting that DuRousseau filed suit against PragerU, Streit and others, alleging race and sexual-orientation discrimination, a hostile work environment and retaliation.

    "You mean the organization that had you spew racist and discriminatory bullshit against Palestinians is acting racist and discriminatory against your black ass? Karma has kicked it into overdrive lately 😂"
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    House says the organization that had DuRousseau make what House calls racist and discriminatory remarks about Palestinians is now acting racist and discriminatory toward him, and calls it karma.

    After the statement

    House posted the comment on Nov. 9.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. House characterizes PragerU as acting racist and discriminatory toward DuRousseau, which criticizes the conduct under scrutiny. The post also mocks DuRousseau and calls the situation karma, but that does not change its critical evaluation of PragerU's alleged conduct.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Red MediaPop-culture and news commentary account, in a post on X

    Before this statement

    Red Media posted the comment on Nov. 9, two days after Current Revolt published the first page of the complaint.

    "Xavier DuRousseau, the Black gay MAGA Republican who has previously attacked Cardi B, Beyoncé and Megan Thee Stallion for supporting Kamala Harris and is also a Nicki Minaj fan, is reportedly suing a horrific conservative organisation he works for, PragerU over alleged workplace discrimination and racism. He claims he was treated unfairly compared to his co-workers. Interestingly, the only way he stands a chance of winning this case is through the policies implemented by Democrats in the state."
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    Red Media reports that DuRousseau is suing PragerU, calls PragerU a horrific conservative organization, and says DuRousseau's only chance of winning rests on policies Democrats enacted in the state.

    After the statement

    The post ends with a link to a video on another Red Media X account.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. Red Media does not assess the specific allegations, but it describes PragerU, the party accused of that conduct, as horrific while reporting the suit, which is a critical evaluation. Its remark that DuRousseau can win only through Democratic policies targets his politics rather than PragerU's conduct, so the statement is not mixed on the matter under scrutiny.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. GenXGirlPolitical commentator, in a post on X

    Before this statement

    GenXGirl quotes Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt post reporting that DuRousseau filed suit against PragerU, Streit and others, alleging race and sexual-orientation discrimination, a hostile work environment and retaliation.

    "So Xaviaer DuRousseau who shills for Israel’s genocide, laughs at Palestinians starving & said we are jealous of Zionists because we aren’t as successful as them…is now claiming the Zionist Org, PragerU, that he works for…discriminated against him? 😂 Karma"
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    GenXGirl cites DuRousseau's past comments about Israel, Palestinians and Zionists and answers his claim that PragerU discriminated against him with a laughing emoji and the word karma.

    After the statement

    The post was published Nov. 9, two days after Ortiz's report.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. GenXGirl does not say whether that conduct occurred or was wrong. The post ridicules DuRousseau's standing to claim discrimination, given his past comments, and calls the situation karma, which disputes his account of himself as a wronged employee without defending or condemning PragerU's alleged conduct.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. AT2YouTube commentator, in the description of a video on the AT2 channel

    Before this statement

    The description says DuRousseau was a PragerU personality until he was fired in July, that he is suing his former bosses for discrimination, and that he says he was expected to raise more money than his white counterparts.

    "Well according to his lawsuit, he faced some of the same racism that he used to try to excuse or pacify."
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    In the description of a video about the lawsuit, AT2 says DuRousseau built a career on denying systemic racism and, according to his lawsuit, faced the same racism he had tried to excuse or pacify.

    After the statement

    The 20-minute video was posted on Nov. 7, U.S. Pacific time.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. AT2 takes the lawsuit's account as describing racism DuRousseau faced and frames it as the racism he had tried to excuse, which is a critical evaluation of the alleged conduct. The description's main target is DuRousseau's past commentary, and it attributes the facts to the lawsuit, but it neither disputes nor defends the conduct.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

View all 10 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. RC MaxwellPentagon reporter for RedState, in a post on his X account

    Before this statement

    Maxwell quotes Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt post reporting that DuRousseau filed suit against PragerU, Streit and others, alleging race and sexual-orientation discrimination, a hostile work environment and retaliation.

    "Prager U is in Los Angeles, they are cooked in their court system. Don’t hire grossly unprofessional people, and if you must, make them a contractor."
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    Maxwell says PragerU faces a hostile court system in Los Angeles and that organizations should not hire "grossly unprofessional people" or, if they must, should make them contractors.

    After the statement

    Maxwell posted the comment on Nov. 7, the day Ortiz posted the first page of the complaint and summarized its allegations in a thread.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. Maxwell does not address whether that conduct occurred. He attributes PragerU's legal exposure to the Los Angeles courts and to hiring DuRousseau, whom he casts as grossly unprofessional. That disputes DuRousseau's account of himself as a wronged employee without defending the conduct the complaint alleges.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. An0malyHip-hop artist and political commentator, in a post on his X account

    Before this statement

    An0maly quotes Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt post reporting that DuRousseau filed suit against PragerU, Streit and others, alleging race and sexual-orientation discrimination, a hostile work environment and retaliation.

    "A Zionist organization hires an annoying black guy to shill their agenda and he ends up suing for racism and homophobia. The right is collapsing on every level because it was never real."
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    An0maly says PragerU hired DuRousseau to promote its agenda only for him to sue it for racism and homophobia, and he presents the lawsuit as a sign that the political right "was never real."

    After the statement

    An0maly posted the comment on Nov. 7, the day Ortiz posted the first page of the complaint and summarized its allegations in a thread.

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. An0maly does not assess the specific allegations. He criticizes PragerU for hiring DuRousseau "to shill their agenda" and treats the suit for racism and homophobia as evidence that the right "was never real," while calling DuRousseau "an annoying black guy" in the same post.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. PragerUOrganization named as the lead defendant, in a statement on its websiteDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    PragerU posted the statement on its website under a headline about the lawsuit filed by its former PragerForce personality and gave the same statement to The Post Millennial.

    "PragerU wholly rejects recent claims made by a former PragerForce personality, Xaviaer DuRousseau. PragerU does not tolerate discrimination of any kind and takes appropriate action whenever necessary."
    Denied

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    In a statement posted on its website, PragerU says it wholly rejects DuRousseau's claims, that it does not tolerate discrimination of any kind and that it takes appropriate action whenever necessary.

    After the statement

    The statement goes on to say that many businesses, especially conservative organizations, are too often confronted with "a kind of lawfare aimed at destroying them" and that litigation takes resources from PragerU's mission. It adds that the case strengthens its resolve to defend PragerU's good name.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is PragerU's treatment of DuRousseau as alleged in his November 3, 2026 lawsuit: whether it discriminated against him, allowed a hostile workplace and wrongfully pushed him out. PragerU rejects his claims outright and says it does not tolerate discrimination, which denies the alleged conduct.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Xaviaer DuRousseauPlaintiff and former PragerU personality, in his complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior CourtDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    The Post Millennial reports that, according to the complaint, seven men surrounded DuRousseau in Washington, D.C., in June 2026, called him an anti-gay slur and tried to physically assault him, and that he then told management he would not go back to the city without security.

    "scoffed at Plaintiff's safety concerns and continued to refuse to provide security personnel"
    Condemned

    Responding to: DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

    Full statement and sources

    In his complaint, as quoted by The Post Millennial, DuRousseau alleges that after he told management he would not return to Washington, D.C. without security, PragerU scoffed at his safety concerns and kept refusing to provide security personnel.

    After the statement

    The complaint says that when he raised security with CEO Marissa Streit, she told him that if he felt so in danger that he needed security, he was a "safety threat to our donors," which it calls weaponizing his safety concerns against him.

    DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summaryCase No. 26STCV34663: case information, parties, documents filed and register of actions, as displayed November 9, 2026
    Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) posts the first page of DuRousseau's complaint against PragerUPost text and the attached image of the complaint's first page

    Why this label?

    The reference point is PragerU's treatment of DuRousseau as alleged in his November 3, 2026 lawsuit: whether it discriminated against him, allowed a hostile workplace and wrongfully pushed him out. The complaint accuses PragerU of dismissing his safety concerns and refusing him security, which condemns that treatment.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(12)

Original text

DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summary

DuRousseau v. Prager University Foundation, No. 26STCV34663 (L.A. Super. Ct.): case summary (opens in a new tab)Case No. 26STCV34663: case information, parties, documents filed and register of actions, as displayed November 9, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Case No. 26STCV34663: case information, parties, documents filed and register of actions, as displayed November 9, 2026

About this source

The Los Angeles Superior Court's online case summary for Xaviaer DuRousseau's suit against the Prager University Foundation. It lists the November 3, 2026 filing date, the case type (wrongful termination), the Spring Street Courthouse, the plaintiff and eight defendants, the case's assignment to Judge Kristin S. Escalante in Department 2 and a case management conference set for March 3, 2027. The summary opens from a case number search on the court's website.

Author
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Published
Accessed

Original post

Red Media posts about DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

Red Media's post on DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU.

Author
Red Media
Published
Accessed

Original video

PragerU Used Him... Now Xavier DuRousseau Is Suing Them for Racism

About this source

AT2's YouTube video on DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU; the quoted passage is from the video's description.

Author
AT2
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Niko House responds to DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

House's quote post responding to Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt report that DuRousseau sued PragerU, its chief executive Marissa Streit and others.

Author
Niko House
Published
Accessed

Original post

GenXGirl responds to DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

GenXGirl's quote post responding to Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt report that DuRousseau sued PragerU, its chief executive Marissa Streit and others.

Author
GenXGirl
Published
Accessed

Original text

Ex-PragerU Star Who Denied Systemic Racism Exists Is Now Suing for Racial Discrimination

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section headed Where the Case Stands

About this source

Greene's History Can't Hide essay on DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU and his past commentary on racism.

Author
Kahlil Greene
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Mark Meckler responds to DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

Meckler's post responding to news that DuRousseau had sued PragerU.

Author
Mark Meckler
Published
Accessed

Original post

An0maly responds to DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

An0maly's quote post responding to Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt report that DuRousseau sued PragerU, its chief executive Marissa Streit and others.

Author
An0maly
Published
Accessed

Original post

RC Maxwell responds to DuRousseau's lawsuit against PragerU on X

About this source

Maxwell's quote post responding to Tony Ortiz's Current Revolt report that DuRousseau sued PragerU, its chief executive Marissa Streit and others.

Author
RC Maxwell
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Statement Regarding the Lawsuit Filed Against PragerU by Former PragerForce Personality Xaviaer DuRousseau

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full statement

About this source

PragerU's statement on its website responding to DuRousseau's lawsuit. The page shows no date; PragerU's site map lists it as last updated on November 7, 2026.

Author
PragerU
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Xaviaer DuRousseau files suit against PragerU over 'hostile work environment,' 'discrimination' after 'wrongful termination'

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article, as updated November 9, 2026

About this source

The Post Millennial summarizes the allegations in DuRousseau's complaint, quoting it directly, and prints the statement PragerU gave the outlet in response.

Author
Thomas Stevenson
Published
Accessed

Original post

Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) posts the first page of DuRousseau's complaint against PragerU

About this source

Tony Ortiz of Current Revolt reports the suit and posts an image of the complaint's first page. The page shows the Los Angeles Superior Court's electronic filing stamp of November 3, 2026, case number 26STCV34663, DuRousseau's attorneys at Shegerian & Associates, the defendants and the first eight causes of action, among them discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

Author
Tony Ortiz
Published
Accessed

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

14 updates added in the last 7 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Xaviaer DuRousseau sues PragerU, alleging discrimination and wrongful termination; PragerU rejects the claims
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/xaviaer-durousseau-sues-prageru-discrimination-wrongful-termination

The Dispute Index. "Xaviaer DuRousseau sues PragerU, alleging discrimination and wrongful termination; PragerU rejects the claims". First published: 2026-11-09. Last updated: 2026-11-09. https://disputeindex.com/cases/xaviaer-durousseau-sues-prageru-discrimination-wrongful-termination