The Dispute Index

Was the House justified in holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress over the Epstein inquiry?

The House agreed on September 16 to hold Leon Black in contempt over two Oversight Committee subpoenas in the Epstein inquiry. Comer and Garcia say he defied them; Black's lawyers call the action retaliation and dispute the subpoenas' validity.

Claim in dispute

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Leon BlackHouse Committee on Oversight and Government ReformJames Comer Jr.
U.S. PoliticsGovernment TransparencyPrivacy

Overview

The fixed reference point for classification in this case is the decision to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over two subpoenas the House Oversight Committee issued on June 26, 2026. The committee recommended contempt on September 15, 2026, and the House agreed on September 16. Responses are recorded against that decision, not against Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, allegations about Black in the wider investigation, or the merits of Black's separate lawsuit.

The committee's report (opens in a new tab) says Black appeared voluntarily for a transcribed interview on June 26, declined to answer some questions about nondisclosure agreements, and was served with a deposition subpoena and a document subpoena. It says the deposition was moved at Black's request to September 3, that Black did not appear, and that he produced one nondisclosure agreement. The committee calls his stated reasons for non-compliance without merit.

Black's attorneys dispute that account. In a July 24 letter to Chairman Comer (opens in a new tab), they said the questions about nondisclosure agreements were unanticipated and that Black was producing the only confidentiality agreement meeting the committee's definition of relevance. Black's September 3 complaint (opens in a new tab) asks a federal court to bar enforcement of the subpoenas, alleging that they exceed the committee's delegated authority and would expose women who value their privacy. After the House acted, his attorneys said the action was politically motivated and retaliatory (opens in a new tab).

The House agreed to the resolution by unanimous consent on September 16 (opens in a new tab), with no objection and no recorded vote. The committee's recorded vote (opens in a new tab) on September 15 was 41 to 0: 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats voted aye, and six Republicans were not recorded. No other member asked to be heard after Comer and Ranking Member Robert Garcia spoke, according to the meeting video (opens in a new tab). As of September 25, 2026, we could not locate a public statement from a member of Congress defending Black's decision not to appear for the deposition.

The resolution directs the Speaker to certify the committee's report to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. ABC News (opens in a new tab) reported that Speaker Mike Johnson must certify the resolution before it goes to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, and, as CNBC (opens in a new tab) reported, a Justice Department spokesperson said the department expects to receive the referral and will review it carefully. As of September 25, 2026, we could not locate a public report that the report had been certified or that the U.S. Attorney's Office had announced a decision. The CourtListener copy of the court docket (opens in a new tab) for Black's lawsuit, last updated September 18, listed filings through September 9 and no ruling on Black's claims.

People in this case

Timeline

10 timeline entries on this page. Dates: June 26, 2026 to September 16, 2026

  1. June 2026

    1 event

    1. Black appears for a voluntary interview and Comer issues two subpoenas

      Incident

      Leon Black appeared voluntarily for a transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee, which Chairman James Comer had requested in a March 3 letter. Comer said Black stated he would not answer questions about nondisclosure agreements, and issued two subpoenas during the interview: one for a deposition on July 16 and one for nondisclosure agreements. Black's attorneys later said the interview was halted by unanticipated questioning about nondisclosure agreements.

      [01]Chairman Comer Issues Two Subpoenas to Leon Black

      Source excerpt

      During today's voluntary transcribed interview, Mr. Black stated he wouldn't answer questions about NDAs.

      Committee release announcing that Comer issued a deposition subpoena and a nondisclosure-agreement subpoena to Black during his June 26, 2026 voluntary interview.

      Chairman Comer Issues Two Subpoenas to Leon Black · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull release
      [02]House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law.

      The committee's report on the contempt resolution. It sets out the subpoena history, the committee's account of Black's non-compliance, its response to the reasons Black gave, and the recorded committee vote. It states the committee's position, not a court finding.

      House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
      [03]Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint)

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black is today producing the only confidentiality agreement that remotely meets this definition of relevance.

      Black's counsel's response to the committee's document subpoena, filed publicly as an exhibit to the complaint. It states Black's account of the June 26 interview and his reasons for producing one agreement.

      Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint) · Free Law ProjectExhibit D, pages 1-3

  2. 28 days between recorded events

    July 2026

    1 event

    1. Black's counsel objects to the document subpoena and produces one agreement

      Claim

      In a letter to Comer, Black's counsel at Hogan Lovells Cadwalader said Black was producing the only confidentiality agreement that, in their view, met the committee's stated definition of relevance. The letter objected that the request for all nondisclosure agreements went beyond the committee's investigation and would affect the privacy of other people. The committee's report later said the request required all such agreements and rejected the objection.

      [03]Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint)

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black is today producing the only confidentiality agreement that remotely meets this definition of relevance.

      Black's counsel's response to the committee's document subpoena, filed publicly as an exhibit to the complaint. It states Black's account of the June 26 interview and his reasons for producing one agreement.

      Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint) · Free Law ProjectExhibit D, pages 1-3
      [02]House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law.

      The committee's report on the contempt resolution. It sets out the subpoena history, the committee's account of Black's non-compliance, its response to the reasons Black gave, and the recorded committee vote. It states the committee's position, not a court finding.

      House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration

  3. 25 days between recorded events

    August 2026

    1 event

    1. Comer rejects Black's objections and says contempt is among the committee's tools

      Claim

      Comer wrote to Black's counsel that the committee rejected the July 24 objections and that full compliance required all nondisclosure agreements to which Black is a party. The letter said that if Black did not provide responsive documents or appear for his September 3 deposition, the committee would use all tools at its disposal, including contempt. Black's attorney Susan Estrich said that night that the letter misrepresented the facts, according to The Guardian.

      [04]Letter from Chairman Comer to Black's counsel, August 18, 2026 (Exhibit E to the complaint)

      Source excerpt

      If Mr. Black refuses to provide the Committee with responsive documents or refuses to appear for his scheduled deposition on September 3, 2026, the Committee will use all tools at its disposal, including contempt.

      Comer's reply to Black's counsel, filed publicly as an exhibit to the complaint. It rejects the July 24 objections and warns that contempt is among the tools the committee would use.

      Letter from Chairman Comer to Black's counsel, August 18, 2026 (Exhibit E to the complaint) · Free Law ProjectExhibit E, closing paragraphs
      [05]Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair

      Source excerpt

      If Mr Black refuses to provide the Committee with responsive documents or refuses to appear for his scheduled deposition on September 3, 2026, the Committee will use all tools at its disposal, including contempt

      Report on Comer's August 18 letter and on the response from Black's attorney Susan Estrich.

      Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair · The GuardianFull article

  4. 16 days between recorded events

    September 2026

    7 events

    1. Black does not appear for his deposition

      Incident

      Black did not appear for the deposition scheduled for 10:00 a.m., which had been moved from July 16 at his request. The committee's report says his counsel sent a letter hours before saying Black respectfully declined to provide deposition testimony that day. Comer said the deposition would go forward for the record with an empty chair for Black.

      [02]House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law.

      The committee's report on the contempt resolution. It sets out the subpoena history, the committee's account of Black's non-compliance, its response to the reasons Black gave, and the recorded committee vote. It states the committee's position, not a court finding.

      House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
      [06]Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition

      Source excerpt

      there will be an empty chair for Mr. Black.

      Chairman Comer's statement on September 3, 2026, when Black did not appear for his deposition and had filed a lawsuit.

      Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement

    2. Black sues the committee and Comer in federal court

      Claim

      Black filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the House Oversight Committee and Comer, No. 1:26-cv-03084, assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. The complaint alleges that the subpoenas are invalid to the extent they exceed the committee's delegated authority and that they would expose women who value their privacy. It seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of the subpoenas.

      [07]Complaint, Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 3, 2026)

      Source excerpt

      The subpoenas are invalid to the extent they exceed OGR’s delegated authority in seeking private information that bears no legitimate connection to OGR’s legislative purpose.

      Black's federal complaint against the committee and Chairman Comer. It seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of the two subpoenas. The allegations are Black's, not court findings.

      Complaint, Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 3, 2026) · Free Law ProjectDoc. 1, page 1 and Introduction
      [08]Docket: Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C.)

      Source excerpt

      COMPLAINT against JAMES COMER, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

      Court docket for Black's lawsuit, assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. The entries viewed run from the complaint on September 3 through appearance filings on September 9 and include no ruling.

      Docket: Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C.) · Free Law ProjectDocket entries 1 to 10 (Sept. 3 to Sept. 9, 2026), viewed Sept. 25, 2026

    3. Comer announces a markup of a contempt resolution

      Comer announced a September 15 committee markup to consider a resolution and report recommending that the House find Black in contempt of Congress for what the announcement called "defying lawful subpoenas." Comer said the committee would defend Congress's constitutional authority and take action to hold Black accountable.

      [09]Chairman Comer Announces Markup of Resolution to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress

      Source excerpt

      announced a markup on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, to consider a resolution and accompanying report recommending to the U.S. House of Representatives that Leon Black be found in contempt of Congress for defying lawful subpoenas.

      Committee announcement of the September 15 markup of the contempt resolution, with Comer's statement of why the committee would act.

      Chairman Comer Announces Markup of Resolution to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull release

    4. Black's attorneys ask the committee to postpone the markup and file an ethics complaint

      Claim

      Black's attorneys sent letters to Comer and Ranking Member Robert Garcia asking the committee to postpone its contempt markup until members had all material information, the Office of Congressional Conduct had reviewed a complaint about Comer, and the court had ruled on Black's lawsuit. They said they had filed a confidential complaint with the Office of Congressional Conduct that morning, alleging conduct by Comer relating to the deposition that they said may violate House rules.

      [10]Statement from Leon Black’s Attorneys on Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Mark-up and Contempt Resolution

      Source excerpt

      This is retaliation - plain and simple.

      Paid press release from Black's attorneys, distributed through Business Wire, responding to the committee's markup and contempt resolution. It says the attorneys submitted letters to the committee and filed a confidential complaint with the Office of Congressional Conduct.

      Statement from Leon Black’s Attorneys on Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Mark-up and Contempt ResolutionBusiness Wire release dated Sept. 15, 2026, as republished by Yahoo Finance
      [11]Letter from Black's counsel to Chairman Comer and Ranking Member Garcia requesting postponement of the contempt markup (September 15, 2026)

      Source excerpt

      we respectfully request that you postpone the Committee’s consideration of the proposed contempt resolution until

      Letter from Black's counsel asking the committee to postpone the September 15 markup until members had all material information, the Office of Congressional Conduct had reviewed a complaint about Comer, and the court had ruled on Black's lawsuit.

      Letter from Black's counsel to Chairman Comer and Ranking Member Garcia requesting postponement of the contempt markup (September 15, 2026) · Levin Center for Oversight and DemocracyLetter, pages 1-3

    5. Oversight Committee votes 41-0 to report the contempt resolution

      Incident

      At a business meeting, the committee adopted by voice vote an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Comer, then approved the report by a recorded vote of 41 ayes to 0 noes. The roll call sheet shows 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting aye, with six Republicans not recorded. No other member asked to be heard after Comer and Ranking Member Robert Garcia spoke, according to the meeting video.

      [02]House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law.

      The committee's report on the contempt resolution. It sets out the subpoena history, the committee's account of Black's non-compliance, its response to the reasons Black gave, and the recorded committee vote. It states the committee's position, not a court finding.

      House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
      [12]Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026)

      Source excerpt

      Roll Call Totals: Ayes: 41 Nays: 0

      Committee roll call sheet for the vote to report the contempt resolution. It records 41 ayes and 0 noes, with 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting aye and six Republican members not recorded.

      Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
      [13]Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026)

      Source excerpt

      Mr. Chairman, on this vote, the ayes are 41, the nays are 0.

      Committee video of the September 15 markup of the Black contempt resolution. It shows Chairman Comer's opening remarks, Ranking Member Garcia's remarks, the chair's call for other members to be heard, and the announced vote total.

      Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformComer opening remarks from about 0:50; Garcia remarks from about 3:45; roll call and vote total after Garcia's remarks

    6. House agrees to H. Res. 1543 by unanimous consent

      Incident

      Comer asked unanimous consent to call up H. Res. 1543 and for its immediate consideration. There was no objection, and the resolution was agreed to without a recorded vote. It finds Black in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with the June 26 deposition and document subpoenas and directs the Speaker to certify the committee's report to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

      [14]Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress

      Source excerpt

      There was no objection.

      Official record of the House floor action on H. Res. 1543: Comer's request for unanimous consent, the absence of objection, and agreement to the resolution.

      Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
      [15]H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress)

      Source excerpt

      On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.

      Congress.gov action history for H. Res. 1543. It lists consideration by unanimous consent and agreement to the resolution without objection on September 16, 2026.

      H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress) · United States CongressActions dated 09/16/2026, 2:35 pm and 2:36 pm
      [16]Chairman Comer Statement on Leon Black Being Found in Contempt of Congress

      Source excerpt

      Leon Black defied two subpoenas, and the U.S. House of Representatives acted swiftly to find him in contempt of Congress.

      Chairman Comer's statement after the House approved the contempt resolution by unanimous consent.

      Chairman Comer Statement on Leon Black Being Found in Contempt of Congress · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement and background

    7. Justice Department says it expects the referral

      Reaction

      A Justice Department spokesperson said the department expects to receive the referral from the House Oversight Committee and takes allegations of contempt of Congress seriously. The spokesperson also said the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia will review the referral carefully. ABC News reported that Speaker Mike Johnson must certify the resolution before it is sent to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro.

      [17]House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe

      Source excerpt

      The Department of Justice is expecting to receive the referral from House Oversight Committee and takes allegations of contempt of Congress seriously

      ABC News report on the House action, the certification step before referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, and the Justice Department's statement.

      House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe · ABC NewsParagraphs on the referral and the Justice Department statement
      [18]House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over Epstein subpoenas defiance

      Source excerpt

      The House of Representatives has rushed through every stage of this inquiry.

      CNBC report on the House action. It quotes Black's attorneys at length and a Justice Department spokesperson's statement about the expected referral.

      House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over Epstein subpoenas defiance · CNBCParagraphs quoting Black's attorneys and the Justice Department spokesperson

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Sources (1)

Disputed claim

Susan Estrich and Aaron Cutler, attorneys for Leon Black, said Black gave the Oversight Committee the only confidentiality agreement that Jeffrey Epstein knew about and that the committee has continued to insist on looking for information that does not exist.

Susan Estrich

Sources (2)

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 7. Dates: September 3, 2026 to September 16, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

6 responses on this page

  1. Suhas Subramanyam
    "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress. His name appears in the Epstein files hundreds of times, and he gave Epstein $180 million. The survivors told us to follow the money and that is exactly what we are doing. ... Whatever happened, the reality is he has a lot of information, a lot of documents that are central to our investigation and he's refusing."
    Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Suhas Subramanyam on X: "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress." · Suhas SubramanyamPost and attached 30-second video, Sept. 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
    Read the bill (opens in a new tab)H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress) · United States CongressActions dated 09/16/2026, 2:35 pm and 2:36 pm
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Was the House justified in holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress over the Epstein inquiry?

    Read more

    In a post on X with a short video, Rep. Suhas Subramanyam said "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress". In the video he said Black has "a lot of documents that are central to our investigation" and is refusing to provide them.

    Role at the time: Member of the House Oversight Committee, in a post on X with an attached video

    Before the statement

    The House agreed to the contempt resolution by unanimous consent on September 16, 2026, after the Oversight Committee voted 41 to 0 on September 15 to recommend it.

    After the statement

    The post appeared at 2:53 p.m. Eastern time on September 16, after the House agreed to the resolution at 2:36 p.m., according to Congress.gov. The committee's report says Black made payments to Epstein totaling over $158 million and potentially exceeding $170 million.

    Rep. Suhas Subramanyam on X: "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress." · Suhas SubramanyamPost and attached 30-second video, Sept. 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
    H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress) · United States CongressActions dated 09/16/2026, 2:35 pm and 2:36 pm
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Subramanyam announces the action approvingly and says Black is refusing to hand over documents central to the investigation. That is support for the action itself.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  2. Robert Garcia
    "This vote is an important step towards justice and accountability. Leon Black has continued to defy two congressional subpoenas and we need to know why he gave Jeffrey Epstein $180 million dollars."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Ranking Member Robert Garcia Statement After House Votes to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress · House Oversight DemocratsFull statement
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

    Read more

    In a press release after the House agreed to the resolution, Ranking Member Robert Garcia said Black had continued to defy two congressional subpoenas. Garcia called the action "an important step towards justice and accountability" and said the committee needs to know why Black "gave Jeffrey Epstein $180 million dollars".

    Role at the time: Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee, in a press release

    Before the statement

    The House agreed to the contempt resolution by unanimous consent on September 16, 2026, the day after the Oversight Committee voted 41 to 0 to recommend it.

    After the statement

    The release also says Garcia called on Black to be held in contempt earlier in September, after Black defied two subpoenas. The committee's report says Black made payments to Epstein totaling over $158 million and potentially exceeding $170 million.

    Ranking Member Robert Garcia Statement After House Votes to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress · House Oversight DemocratsFull statement
    Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Garcia calls it an important step and says Black continued to defy two subpoenas. He supports the action itself, so the label is a defense rather than a challenge to how it is characterized.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  3. James Comer Jr.Directly involved
    "I subpoenaed Leon Black for testimony and documents critical to our investigation, but he has refused to comply. Leon Black is legally required to appear for a deposition before the Oversight Committee and required to turn over all non-disclosure agreements to which he was a party. The Committee also asked for all NDAs and confidentiality agreements that Epstein and Maxwell were involved or referenced in. He defied Congress and refused to do either. Instead, Mr. Black is hiding behind litigation to delay having to provide answers to the American people. No one is above the law. ... Subpoenas are not suggestions. They carry the force of law and require full compliance. ... We made it clear to Mr. Black and his attorneys that if he did not comply, then the Committee would initiate contempt proceedings. We have no choice but to hold him in contempt."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Oversight Committee Republicans and Democrats Hold Leon Black in Contempt for Defying Lawful Subpoenas · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformChairman Comer's opening remarks as prepared for delivery
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformComer opening remarks from about 0:50; Garcia remarks from about 3:45; roll call and vote total after Garcia's remarks
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

    Read more

    In opening remarks at the committee's September 15 markup, Chairman James Comer said Black was legally required to appear for a deposition and to turn over all nondisclosure agreements to which he was a party, and that he refused to do either. Comer said Black was hiding behind litigation, that "Subpoenas are not suggestions" and that the committee had told Black and his attorneys it would begin contempt proceedings if he did not comply.

    Role at the time: Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, in opening remarks at a committee markup

    Before the statement

    The committee said Black failed to appear for his September 3, 2026 deposition, withheld nondisclosure agreements and sued Comer and the committee.

    After the statement

    The committee then voted 41 to 0 to report the resolution to the full House, according to the vote total announced at the meeting.

    Oversight Committee Republicans and Democrats Hold Leon Black in Contempt for Defying Lawful Subpoenas · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformChairman Comer's opening remarks as prepared for delivery
    Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformComer opening remarks from about 0:50; Garcia remarks from about 3:45; roll call and vote total after Garcia's remarks

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Comer argues that Black was required to comply, was using litigation to avoid answering and left the committee no choice. He advocates the contempt action itself, which is a defense of it rather than a dispute over how it is described.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  4. House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformDirectly involved
    "Mr. Black invoked no valid reason for refusing to appear for a deposition and refusing to produce all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) referencing Epstein or Maxwell as well as all NDAs to which he is a party, and the Oversight Committee's efforts to persuade him to testify and produce documents have reached an impasse. ... A lawful, duly issued congressional subpoena preempts any terms of confidentiality in an NDA and it is the prerogative of the Oversight Committee to consider or weigh privacy concerns against its investigative needs. ... Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law."
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

    Read more

    In House Report 119-831, the committee said Leon Black invoked no valid reason for refusing to appear for a deposition or to produce all the nondisclosure agreements it subpoenaed. It said a lawful subpoena "preempts any terms of confidentiality in an NDA" and that the committee, not the witness, weighs third-party privacy against its investigative needs. It concluded that his refusal warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

    Role at the time: House committee, in its report on the contempt resolution submitted by Chairman James Comer

    Before the statement

    Comer issued a deposition subpoena and a document subpoena to Black on June 26, 2026. The report says the deposition was moved at Black's request to September 3, that Black's counsel declined to give deposition testimony in a letter hours before it began, and that Black sued the committee that day.

    After the statement

    The committee approved the report by a recorded vote of 41 to 0 on September 15. The House agreed to the resolution on September 16 by unanimous consent.

    House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
    Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, the committee argues that Black's stated reasons for not complying do not excuse it and asks the House to adopt the contempt resolution. That is a defense of the action itself, which separates it from a statement that only disputes how the action is described.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  5. James Walkinshaw
    "Absolutely. Look, complying with a congressional subpoena is not optional. Mr. Black is going to have to come in and answer these questions. Whether it happens now, a week from now, or a month from now, it absolutely will happen. If he continues to refuse, he should be held in contempt."
    Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)'He should be held in contempt': Oversight Rep. on Leon Black DEFYING subpoena in Epstein probe · MS NOWWalkinshaw's answer about 1:05 to 1:20
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Was the House justified in holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress over the Epstein inquiry?

    Read more

    Asked on MS NOW whether the committee should hold Black in contempt immediately, Rep. James Walkinshaw answered "Absolutely". He said Black will have to answer the committee's questions and that "If he continues to refuse, he should be held in contempt".

    Role at the time: Member of the House Oversight Committee, in an MS NOW interview

    Before the statement

    Black had sued the committee and Comer and did not appear for his September 3, 2026 deposition. The anchor asked whether the committee should hold him in contempt immediately.

    After the statement

    The Oversight Committee voted 41 to 0 on September 15, 2026 to recommend contempt, and the House agreed to the resolution by unanimous consent on September 16.

    'He should be held in contempt': Oversight Rep. on Leon Black DEFYING subpoena in Epstein probe · MS NOWWalkinshaw's answer about 1:05 to 1:20
    Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Walkinshaw answers "Absolutely" when asked whether the committee should hold Black in contempt immediately. He then says contempt should follow if Black continues to refuse. He supports the action itself, so the label is a defense rather than mixed or conditional.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  6. Nancy Mace
    "Leon Black must be held in contempt"
    Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Nancy Mace on X: "Leon Black must be held in contempt" · Nancy MacePost, Sept. 3, 2026, 12:00 p.m. ET
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Was the House justified in holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress over the Epstein inquiry?

    Read more

    In a post on X on September 3, 2026, Rep. Nancy Mace shared a CNBC report that Black had sued the House Oversight Committee and would not appear that day, and wrote "Leon Black must be held in contempt".

    Role at the time: Member of the House Oversight Committee, in a post on X

    Before the statement

    The committee said Black did not appear for his deposition on September 3, 2026, and had filed a lawsuit against the committee and Comer.

    After the statement

    The Oversight Committee voted 41 to 0 on September 15, 2026 to recommend contempt, and the House agreed to the resolution by unanimous consent on September 16.

    Rep. Nancy Mace on X: "Leon Black must be held in contempt" · Nancy MacePost, Sept. 3, 2026, 12:00 p.m. ET
    Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) · United States CongressVote #1
    Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress · United States CongressPage H5931

    Why this label?

    Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Mace says in plain terms that Black must be held in contempt. That supports the action itself before the committee or the House had acted.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement

Sources

(27)

Original text

House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

House Report 119-831: Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply With Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (opens in a new tab) · United States CongressExecutive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Executive Summary; sections D and E; Conclusion; Committee Consideration

Excerpt

"Mr. Black's willful refusal to comply with the Oversight Committee's subpoenas constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution as prescribed by law."

About this source

The committee's report on the contempt resolution. It sets out the subpoena history, the committee's account of Black's non-compliance, its response to the reasons Black gave, and the recorded committee vote. It states the committee's position, not a court finding.

Author
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (submitted by Chairman James Comer)
Published
Accessed

Reporting

House Holds Billionaire Leon Black In Contempt For Not Testifying About Epstein

House Holds Billionaire Leon Black In Contempt For Not Testifying About Epstein (opens in a new tab) · ForbesSection headed Chief Critic
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section headed Chief Critic

Excerpt

"The Committee has continued to insist on looking for information that does not exist,"

About this source

Forbes report on the House action. It states the House acted by unanimous consent with no debate or roll call and quotes Black's attorneys.

Author
Alison Durkee, Forbes
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

House holds billionaire investor Leon Black in contempt over Epstein probe

House holds billionaire investor Leon Black in contempt over Epstein probe (opens in a new tab) · CNNParagraphs quoting Black's attorneys
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Black's attorneys

Excerpt

"The Committee has continued to insist on looking for information that does not exist."

About this source

CNN report on the House action that quotes Black's attorneys on the agreement Black gave the committee.

Author
Annie Grayer, CNN
Published
Accessed

Reporting

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe (opens in a new tab) · ABC NewsParagraphs on the referral and the Justice Department statement
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs on the referral and the Justice Department statement

Excerpt

"The Department of Justice is expecting to receive the referral from House Oversight Committee and takes allegations of contempt of Congress seriously"

About this source

ABC News report on the House action, the certification step before referral to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, and the Justice Department's statement.

Author
ABC News
Published
Accessed

Reporting

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · PoliticoParagraphs quoting Black's attorneys
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Black's attorneys

Excerpt

"We intend to pursue our litigation challenging this action"

About this source

Politico report on the House action that quotes the attorneys' statement and Comer's and Garcia's statements.

Author
Politico
Published
Accessed

Reporting

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over Epstein subpoenas defiance

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over Epstein subpoenas defiance (opens in a new tab) · CNBCParagraphs quoting Black's attorneys and the Justice Department spokesperson
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Black's attorneys and the Justice Department spokesperson

Excerpt

"The House of Representatives has rushed through every stage of this inquiry."

About this source

CNBC report on the House action. It quotes Black's attorneys at length and a Justice Department spokesperson's statement about the expected referral.

Author
CNBC
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

House votes to hold Epstein associate Leon Black in contempt of Congress

House votes to hold Epstein associate Leon Black in contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · NBC NewsParagraphs quoting Black's attorneys
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Black's attorneys

Excerpt

"The full House is holding him in contempt without any regard to the active litigation challenging the lawfulness of the Committee’s actions and the ethics complaint against Chairman Comer"

About this source

NBC News report on the House action that quotes the statement from Black's attorneys, Comer and Garcia.

Author
Kyle Stewart and Dareh Gregorian, NBC News
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair

Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair (opens in a new tab) · The GuardianFull article
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

Excerpt

"If Mr Black refuses to provide the Committee with responsive documents or refuses to appear for his scheduled deposition on September 3, 2026, the Committee will use all tools at its disposal, including contempt"

About this source

Report on Comer's August 18 letter and on the response from Black's attorney Susan Estrich.

Author
The Guardian
Published
Accessed

Original text

Letter from Chairman Comer to Black's counsel, August 18, 2026 (Exhibit E to the complaint)

Letter from Chairman Comer to Black's counsel, August 18, 2026 (Exhibit E to the complaint) (opens in a new tab) · Free Law ProjectExhibit E, closing paragraphs
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Exhibit E, closing paragraphs

Excerpt

"If Mr. Black refuses to provide the Committee with responsive documents or refuses to appear for his scheduled deposition on September 3, 2026, the Committee will use all tools at its disposal, including contempt."

About this source

Comer's reply to Black's counsel, filed publicly as an exhibit to the complaint. It rejects the July 24 objections and warns that contempt is among the tools the committee would use.

Author
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Chairman James Comer)
Published
Accessed

Original text

Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint)

Letter from Black's counsel (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader) to Chairman Comer, July 24, 2026 (Exhibit D to the complaint) (opens in a new tab) · Free Law ProjectExhibit D, pages 1-3
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Exhibit D, pages 1-3

Excerpt

"Mr. Black is today producing the only confidentiality agreement that remotely meets this definition of relevance."

About this source

Black's counsel's response to the committee's document subpoena, filed publicly as an exhibit to the complaint. It states Black's account of the June 26 interview and his reasons for producing one agreement.

Author
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader US LLP, counsel for Leon Black
Published
Accessed

Original text

Docket: Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C.)

Docket: Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C.) (opens in a new tab) · Free Law ProjectDocket entries 1 to 10 (Sept. 3 to Sept. 9, 2026), viewed Sept. 25, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Docket entries 1 to 10 (Sept. 3 to Sept. 9, 2026), viewed Sept. 25, 2026

Excerpt

"COMPLAINT against JAMES COMER, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM"

About this source

Court docket for Black's lawsuit, assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. The entries viewed run from the complaint on September 3 through appearance filings on September 9 and include no ruling.

Author
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (via CourtListener)
Published
Accessed

Original text

Complaint, Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 3, 2026)

Complaint, Black v. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, No. 1:26-cv-03084 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 3, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Free Law ProjectDoc. 1, page 1 and Introduction
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Doc. 1, page 1 and Introduction

Excerpt

"The subpoenas are invalid to the extent they exceed OGR’s delegated authority in seeking private information that bears no legitimate connection to OGR’s legislative purpose."

About this source

Black's federal complaint against the committee and Chairman Comer. It seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of the two subpoenas. The allegations are Black's, not court findings.

Author
Leon D. Black, plaintiff, through counsel
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Letter from Black's counsel to Chairman Comer and Ranking Member Garcia requesting postponement of the contempt markup (September 15, 2026)

Letter from Black's counsel to Chairman Comer and Ranking Member Garcia requesting postponement of the contempt markup (September 15, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Levin Center for Oversight and DemocracyLetter, pages 1-3
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Letter, pages 1-3

Excerpt

"we respectfully request that you postpone the Committee’s consideration of the proposed contempt resolution until"

About this source

Letter from Black's counsel asking the committee to postpone the September 15 markup until members had all material information, the Office of Congressional Conduct had reviewed a complaint about Comer, and the court had ruled on Black's lawsuit.

Author
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader US LLP and Estrich Goldin LLP, counsel for Leon Black
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Statement from Leon Black’s Attorneys on Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Mark-up and Contempt Resolution

Statement from Leon Black’s Attorneys on Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Mark-up and Contempt Resolution (opens in a new tab)Business Wire release dated Sept. 15, 2026, as republished by Yahoo Finance
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Business Wire release dated Sept. 15, 2026, as republished by Yahoo Finance

Excerpt

"This is retaliation - plain and simple."

About this source

Paid press release from Black's attorneys, distributed through Business Wire, responding to the committee's markup and contempt resolution. It says the attorneys submitted letters to the committee and filed a confidential complaint with the Office of Congressional Conduct.

Author
Susan Estrich (Estrich Goldin) and Aaron Cutler (Hogan Lovells Cadwalader), attorneys for Leon Black
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

'He should be held in contempt': Oversight Rep. on Leon Black DEFYING subpoena in Epstein probe

'He should be held in contempt': Oversight Rep. on Leon Black DEFYING subpoena in Epstein probe (opens in a new tab) · MS NOWWalkinshaw's answer about 1:05 to 1:20

Excerpt

"Absolutely. Look, complying with a congressional subpoena is not optional."

About this source

MS NOW interview with a member of the Oversight Committee on the day Black did not appear for his deposition. The anchor asks whether the committee should hold Black in contempt immediately.

Author
MS NOW (interview with Rep. James Walkinshaw)
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Rep. Nancy Mace on X: "Leon Black must be held in contempt"

Rep. Nancy Mace on X: "Leon Black must be held in contempt" (opens in a new tab) · Nancy MacePost, Sept. 3, 2026, 12:00 p.m. ET

Excerpt

"Leon Black must be held in contempt"

About this source

Post by a member of the Oversight Committee sharing a CNBC report that Black had sued the committee and would not appear for his deposition.

Author
Nancy Mace
Published
Accessed

Original post

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam on X: "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress."

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam on X: "We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress." (opens in a new tab) · Suhas SubramanyamPost and attached 30-second video, Sept. 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET

Excerpt

"We just unanimously voted to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress."

About this source

Post by a member of the Oversight Committee, with a short attached video, published after the House agreed to the contempt resolution.

Author
Suhas Subramanyam
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Ranking Member Robert Garcia Statement After House Votes to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress

Ranking Member Robert Garcia Statement After House Votes to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · House Oversight DemocratsFull statement
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full statement

Excerpt

"This vote is an important step towards justice and accountability."

About this source

Ranking Member Garcia's press release after the House agreed to the contempt resolution.

Author
Ranking Member Robert Garcia
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Chairman Comer Issues Two Subpoenas to Leon Black

Chairman Comer Issues Two Subpoenas to Leon Black (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull release
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full release

Excerpt

"During today's voluntary transcribed interview, Mr. Black stated he wouldn't answer questions about NDAs."

About this source

Committee release announcing that Comer issued a deposition subpoena and a nondisclosure-agreement subpoena to Black during his June 26, 2026 voluntary interview.

Author
Chairman James Comer
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition

Chairman Comer Issues Statement on Leon Black Not Appearing for Deposition (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full statement

Excerpt

"there will be an empty chair for Mr. Black."

About this source

Chairman Comer's statement on September 3, 2026, when Black did not appear for his deposition and had filed a lawsuit.

Author
Chairman James Comer
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Chairman Comer Announces Markup of Resolution to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress

Chairman Comer Announces Markup of Resolution to Hold Leon Black in Contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull release
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full release

Excerpt

"announced a markup on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, to consider a resolution and accompanying report recommending to the U.S. House of Representatives that Leon Black be found in contempt of Congress for defying lawful subpoenas."

About this source

Committee announcement of the September 15 markup of the contempt resolution, with Comer's statement of why the committee would act.

Author
Chairman James Comer
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Chairman Comer Statement on Leon Black Being Found in Contempt of Congress

Chairman Comer Statement on Leon Black Being Found in Contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformFull statement and background
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full statement and background

Excerpt

"Leon Black defied two subpoenas, and the U.S. House of Representatives acted swiftly to find him in contempt of Congress."

About this source

Chairman Comer's statement after the House approved the contempt resolution by unanimous consent.

Author
Chairman James Comer
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Oversight Committee Republicans and Democrats Hold Leon Black in Contempt for Defying Lawful Subpoenas

Oversight Committee Republicans and Democrats Hold Leon Black in Contempt for Defying Lawful Subpoenas (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformChairman Comer's opening remarks as prepared for delivery
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Chairman Comer's opening remarks as prepared for delivery

Excerpt

"No one is above the law."

About this source

Committee press release with the text of Chairman Comer's opening remarks for the September 15 markup and the committee's background summary of the subpoenas.

Author
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Chairman James Comer)
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original video

Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026)

Full Committee Business Meeting (House Oversight Committee, September 15, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformComer opening remarks from about 0:50; Garcia remarks from about 3:45; roll call and vote total after Garcia's remarks

Excerpt

"Mr. Chairman, on this vote, the ayes are 41, the nays are 0."

About this source

Committee video of the September 15 markup of the Black contempt resolution. It shows Chairman Comer's opening remarks, Ranking Member Garcia's remarks, the chair's call for other members to be heard, and the announced vote total.

Author
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026)

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform roll call, Vote #1: Favorably Reporting the Leon D. Black Contempt Report (September 15, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · United States CongressVote #1
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Vote #1

Excerpt

"Roll Call Totals: Ayes: 41 Nays: 0"

About this source

Committee roll call sheet for the vote to report the contempt resolution. It records 41 ayes and 0 noes, with 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting aye and six Republican members not recorded.

Author
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Published
Accessed

Original text

H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress)

H.Res.1543 - All Actions (119th Congress) (opens in a new tab) · United States CongressActions dated 09/16/2026, 2:35 pm and 2:36 pm
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Actions dated 09/16/2026, 2:35 pm and 2:36 pm

Excerpt

"On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection."

About this source

Congress.gov action history for H. Res. 1543. It lists consideration by unanimous consent and agreement to the resolution without objection on September 16, 2026.

Author
Congress.gov
Published
Accessed

Original text

Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress

Congressional Record, House, September 16, 2026, page H5931: Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Leon D. Black in Contempt of Congress (opens in a new tab) · United States CongressPage H5931
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Page H5931

Excerpt

"There was no objection."

About this source

Official record of the House floor action on H. Res. 1543: Comer's request for unanimous consent, the absence of objection, and agreement to the resolution.

Author
Congressional Record
Published
Accessed

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.