2026 Midterm Elections

Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.

Related cases

Case

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

At an Atlanta reelection rally, Senator Jon Ossoff said President Donald Trump did not want to do the work of the presidency and instead wanted to build a ballroom and “travel with Natalie” on a Qatari aircraft. Trump allies accused Ossoff of misogyny and of implying an affair with White House aide Natalie Harp. Ossoff did not apologize and said senior White House aides are powerful taxpayer-paid public officials whose influence is fair to scrutinize.

Case

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

At an August 11 Savannah campaign event, Mike Collins said the federal government has a liability when it harms someone after a pardoned January 6 defendant asked about compensation for people he said were targeted by a weaponized political system. Jon Ossoff said the answer backed taxpayer-funded payments to violent January 6 participants; the Collins campaign said it did not back automatic or blanket payouts for people prosecuted for January 6.

Case

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

Jon Ossoff’s campaign ran an ad using Mike Collins’s words “get off of Social Security, get back into the workforce” to say Collins wanted to push beneficiaries off Social Security. Collins’s campaign said he misspoke and meant Medicaid; Ossoff’s campaign said the ad fairly reflected Collins’s support for pressuring beneficiaries into work. The full radio interview contains the surrounding discussion of tax cuts, Medicaid, Social Security, and work incentives.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

More cases

Statements

Reem Ibrahim

Role at the time: Libertarian commentator, on her own X account

September 10, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Trump’s $5,000 election-contingent pledge amounts to bribing people to vote Republican, according to Sam Stein.

"Trump’s bribe is more explicit, but it’s not all that different."

Why we used this label

Combines a negative characterization with a materially different comparison that rejects treating the pledge as fundamentally exceptional. It is not support for the policy.

Reem Ibrahim compares the pledge with other government-spending promises - Reem IbrahimOriginal X post and reply context

Read statement Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?

Amber Martin

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

September 9, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"exactly what's needed in our country"

Why we used this label

Positive response qualified by acceptance of his remaining a Democrat.

Pennsylvania Republican delegates welcome Fetterman without requiring a party switch

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Guy Ciarrocchi

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

September 9, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"the two parties find a way to work together"

Why we used this label

Supports the appearance while qualifying what Republicans should seek next.

Pennsylvania Republican delegates welcome Fetterman without requiring a party switch

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Nonnegotiable Michigan

Role at the time: Petition campaign

September 7, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

"Every constituency must occasionally remind its party that support is earned, not owed."

Why we used this label

The campaign conditions political support on stated commitments. This is one collective position, not a separate condemnation attributed to every signatory.

Nonnegotiable Michigan — petition - Nonnegotiable Michigan

Read statement Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

Rabbi Josh Whinston

Role at the time: Rabbi, Temple Beth Emeth

September 7, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

"But his vision needs to be more inclusive."

Why we used this label

His positive assessment was explicitly qualified.

Michigan rabbis lay out demands for El-Sayed and state Democrats to earn their votes

Read statement Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: United States representative, Meet the Press interview

September 6, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"I think all of that is an irrelevant distraction."

Why we used this label

His answer minimizes the electoral focus on Piker but contains an explicit condemnation of Hamas, so it is not a Hamas endorsement or a refusal to answer.

Jamie Raskin responds to Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison on Meet the Press

Read statement Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Mallory McMorrow

Role at the time: Michigan state senator

August 31, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"when they do something wrong"

Why we used this label

She treated the original remarks as wrong while accepting the value of the apology.

The Arena with Kasie Hunt transcript — August 31, 2026Segment 01

Read statement Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

Xochitl Hinojosa

Role at the time: Democratic strategist and commentator

August 31, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"He admitted he was wrong. He apologized."

Why we used this label

She emphasized corrective action without defending the original statement.

The Arena with Kasie Hunt transcript — August 31, 2026Segment 01

Read statement Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

Moira Donegan

Role at the time: Columnist

August 27, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.

"more encouraged by Ossoff’s pugnaciousness"

Why we used this label

Approval with reservations.

Jon Ossoff went low on Natalie Harp. The plan worked

Read statement Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

Debbie Dingell

Role at the time: United States representative from Michigan

August 26, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"I don't agree with Hasan Piker on a lot of stuff."

Why we used this label

Dingell registers disagreement with Piker but does not offer a specific characterization of the disputed passage in the cited remarks.

Here's What Hasan Piker Said And Why It's So Controversial

Read statement Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

David Axelrod

Role at the time: Democratic political strategist

August 19, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.

"I thought that the attack was tough, fair, pointed. I thought the ‘with Natalie’ part was gratuitous and unnecessary and distracted and detracted from the attack."

Why we used this label

Expressly splits approval of the political argument from disapproval of the personal phrasing.

Ossoff’s Natalie MomentFull article

Read statement Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

Mike Collins

Role at the time: Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Georgia

August 11, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

"“A lot of things have been politicized and weaponized. And when the federal government harms you, then yes, they have a liability to you. That’s easy, yes sir.”"

Why we used this label

Collins’s answer is conditional on government harm and responds to a question broader than January 6 defendants, but the question was posed by a pardoned January 6 defendant who explicitly included January 6 participants.

Georgia Recorder report on Mike Collins’s January 6 compensation remarksSavannah breakfast Q&A; Collins campaign clarification

Read statement Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

People with useful coverage

Chip Roy

Chip Roy is a Republican U.S. representative for Texas's 21st Congressional District, which includes parts of the Austin and San Antonio areas and the Texas Hill Country. A lawyer and former federal prosecutor, he previously served as first assistant attorney general of Texas and chief of staff to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz.

1 case and 1 statement

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Former United States representative from Georgia and conservative political figure.

1 case and 1 statement

Marc Short

Marc Short is chairman of Advancing American Freedom and a founding partner of Advance Strategies. He previously served as chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence and White House director of legislative affairs under President Donald Trump.

1 case and 1 statement

Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh is a journalist, author, and national affairs correspondent for The Nation. Her work covers American politics and public affairs; she also writes books and produces documentary work.

1 case and 1 statement

Daniel Goldman

Daniel Goldman is a Democratic U.S. representative for New York's 10th Congressional District. A former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, he has also worked as a legal analyst and congressional investigator.

1 case and 1 statement

John Kobylt

John Kobylt is a Los Angeles talk-radio host of The John Kobylt Show on KFI AM 640. Previously a co-host of The John and Ken Show, he discusses local politics, public policy, and current events.

1 case and 1 statement

Gloria Allred

Gloria Allred is a civil-rights attorney and founding partner of Allred, Maroko & Goldberg. Her work includes employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and representation of sexual-assault victims.

1 case and 1 statement

Erica York

Erica York is a senior economist at the Tax Foundation, where she researches federal tax policy. She has also taught at Sterling College and holds a master's degree in economics from Wichita State University.

1 case and 1 statement

Matthew Boyle

Matthew Boyle is Washington bureau chief for Breitbart News, where he covers U.S. politics and conducts interviews with public officials. He joined Breitbart in 2012 after reporting for The Daily Caller.

1 case and 1 statement

Jake Shields

Jake Shields is an American former mixed martial arts fighter who competed in the UFC. He hosts Fight Back with Jake Shields, an interview podcast covering combat sports, politics, and current affairs.

1 case and 1 statement

Reem Ibrahim

Reem Ibrahim is a writer, broadcaster, and research fellow in policy and media at Reason, covering regulation, trade, and economic freedom. She previously worked at the Institute of Economic Affairs in London and is a graduate of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

1 case and 1 statement

Evan Kilgore

Evan Kilgore is an American conservative commentator and social media personality. His commentary addresses United States politics, religion, and national identity, and he describes himself publicly as an American exceptionalist.

1 case and 1 statement

More people