Loading record
Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026
1 published statement. Dates: September 15, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 15, 2026
Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Indiana 5th district
Statement summary
Victoria Spartz voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Official House roll call 307 on H.Con.Res. 93, directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Agreed to 220-204 on September 15, 2026, during the 60-day U.S.-Iran ceasefire. As a concurrent resolution it was not presented to the President.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.
1 published statement. Dates: February 28, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: February 28, 2026
Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Indiana at the statement date.
Statement summary
Spartz opposes U.S. nation-building and insists on a clear strategy, while rejecting diplomatic negotiations with dictators and arguing that they understand weapons.
“I don’t support us being engaged in nation-building — it’s up to the people of each nation, & we must have clear strategy.”
Her written post responds on the day of the Iran operation. She combines a substantive limit on military engagement with an argument for using force against the regime.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Spartz opposes U.S. nation-building and insists on a clear strategy, while rejecting diplomatic negotiations with dictators and arguing that they understand weapons.
