Loading record
Public disputes concerning antisemitism, Jewish identity, discrimination, and hostility toward Jewish people.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: August 26, 2026 to September 16, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: August 26, 2026 to September 16, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: August 26, 2026 to September 16, 2026
1 published statement. Dates: August 26, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: August 26, 2026
Role at the time: Host, Timcast IRL
Response to this claim
Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.
“I actually agree with the surface level sentiment. People like Hasan and his followers … were not expressing what I just expressed.”
Pool agrees with a narrower warning about conflation while rejecting Piker’s formulation and the surrounding rhetoric.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Pool agrees with a hypothetical protective warning but expressly says that is not what Piker was doing; he interprets Piker's actual speech as a threat. Agreement with a different hypothetical statement is not material support for the disputed conduct.
1 published statement. Dates: September 16, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 16, 2026
Role at the time: Host, Tim Pool
Statement summary
Tim Pool defended the substance of Macklemore's remarks while questioning the tour removal and dismissing his activism as uninformed.
“Cancel culture is not firing somebody... because they are an offensive person. That's not cancel culture... So that's why I say this actually does kind of qualify. It's close... I actually have no problem to be completely honest [with what Macklemore said]... I'd be willing to bet he doesn't know anything about it.”
Tim Pool video ("MASSIE FILES TO IMPEACH HEGSETH") on his Timcast News channel, discussing both Massie's impeachment push and Macklemore's removal from Ed Sheeran's tour.
Pool defends the substance of Macklemore's on-stage remarks ("I actually have no problem... with what he said") while questioning whether the removal genuinely qualifies as cancel culture and separately dismissing Macklemore's activism as uninformed -- a conditional position combining agreement on the speech itself with skepticism about the surrounding dispute.
