Loading record
Public disputes over whether people were penalized, or discouraged from speaking, because of what they said, published or protested, including claims that a government action was retaliation for speech.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: October 19, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: October 19, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: October 19, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: October 19, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: October 19, 2026
Role at the time: Forensic accounting consultant and financial commentator
Statement summary
Sam Antar argues that the dispute concerns TikTok's political-advertising policy and challenges Sanders's claim of deliberate suppression by billionaires.
“TikTok has prohibited paid political advertising for years. The Musk documentary distributor was cited for violating that policy. The film wasn’t banned.”
Antar quote-posted Sanders's criticism of TikTok and Meta.
Antar disputes the characterization of the ad-account suspension as suppression of the film itself or a demonstrated order by its owner.
Role at the time: Forensic accounting consultant and financial commentator
Statement summary
Sam Antar asks Sanders for evidence that billionaires ordered the suppression, after citing TikTok's ban on paid political ads, Meta's statement that No Kings was mistakenly flagged for suspicious automated activity and Meta's account of the Brazil restrictions.
“You lump three different situations together and blame billionaires for deliberately suppressing democracy. Where’s the evidence they ordered it?”
Antar quote-posted Sanders's criticism of Meta and TikTok.
Antar disputes the characterization of the No Kings suspension as a deliberate order by a billionaire.
