Loading record
Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
3 statements on this page. Dates: September 12, 2026 to October 19, 2026
3 matching statements. Dates: September 12, 2026 to October 19, 2026
3 published statements. Dates: September 12, 2026 to October 19, 2026
3 published statements. Dates: September 12, 2026 to October 19, 2026
3 statements on this page. Dates: September 12, 2026 to October 19, 2026
Role at the time: Host of Roland Martin Unfiltered
Statement summary
Martin argues that Brooks focuses on Ossoff's language while failing to confront the bigotry and associations Ossoff is criticizing. Brian Shapiro joins the discussion.
“he'll call out Ossoff but not the bigotry and THE RACISM OF MIKE COLLINS.”
Roland Martin and Brian Shapiro criticize Collins' responses and Brooks' rebuke of Ossoff. The programme includes clips from the debate and PBS.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Relative to Collins' associations and response, Martin endorses criticism of Collins and rejects Brooks' rebuke of Ossoff.
Role at the time: Host, Roland Martin Unfiltered
Statement summary
Roland Martin said the mail-in voting restrictions would have hurt rural and conservative voters, and welcomed the Supreme Court blocking them.
“He loses again at the Supreme Court... Donald Trump wanted the US Postal Service to be able to put together these federal voting databases... this was going to hurt rural voters... conservatives more than anybody else.”
Roland Martin Unfiltered segment on the Supreme Court blocking Trump's mail-in ballot restrictions.
Martin frames the restrictions as an effort to compile federal voting databases that would hurt rural and conservative voters, and treats the Supreme Court loss as vindication -- an express condemnation of the restrictions.
Role at the time: Host, Roland Martin Unfiltered
Statement summary
Roland Martin called Trump's $5,000 pledge a "con" and a "bribe."
“what did the twice impeached criminally convicted con man in chief do — he announced his new con... They fell for that lie... Fox News was right. Yes, we are going to call it a bribe because that's exactly what it is.”
Roland Martin Unfiltered segment on Trump's $5,000 pledge.
Martin directly calls the pledge a "con" and endorses Fox News's characterization of it as a "bribe," an express condemnation of the pledge as dishonest vote-buying.
