Mark Hertling

Portrait of Mark Hertling
U.S. Army

Mark Hertling is a retired United States Army lieutenant general who commanded U.S. Army Europe. He appears as a military analyst on MS NOW.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Mark Hertling, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Curious how the Pentagon picked troops for Hegseth's speech?

You'll get an email if the Pentagon explains the attendee criteria, or if troops, commanders or members of Congress respond on the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Mark Hertling

Portrait of Mark Hertling

Mark Hertling

Role at the time: Retired United States Army lieutenant general and former commander of U.S. Army Europe, as a military analyst on MS NOW

Condemned

Statement summary

Retired Lieutenant General Mark Hertling, a former commander of U.S. Army Europe, criticised the Pentagon's attendance criteria for Hegseth's address on MS NOW. He said the military measures height and weight rather than waist-to-height, so the requirement was miscommunicated to the force, described the criteria as poor leadership, and relayed an email from a retired senior officer who said he was more concerned about soldiers going blind from eye-rolling. He added that senior officers were following lawful orders while cringing at them.

“This is the performance of a bad squad leader, a bad newly promoted sergeant who's trying to get his troops in line. It smacks of poor leadership.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)'INSANITY': Nicolle reacts to Hegseth demanding only the most ATTRACTIVE troops attend his speech · MS NOWMS NOW official YouTube channel, segment of Deadline: White House broadcast September 17, 2026. Panel: Nicolle Wallace with Paul Rieckhoff, Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (ret.) and Priya Sridhar.
Why we used this label

Hertling rejects them as poor leadership and as a misuse of a defence secretary's time during a war, which condemns the conduct under scrutiny. The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, since part of his answer corrects the terminology, noting the Army uses height and weight rather than waist-to-height. That loses because the correction is preliminary to a substantive judgment about leadership rather than the whole of his response.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage