Loading record
Public disputes concerning armed forces, defense departments, military policy, personnel standards, alliances, procurement, and civil-military institutions.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
5 statements on this page. Dates: March 12, 2026 to October 9, 2026
5 matching statements. Dates: March 12, 2026 to October 9, 2026
5 published statements. Dates: March 12, 2026 to October 9, 2026
5 published statements. Dates: March 12, 2026 to October 9, 2026
5 statements on this page. Dates: March 12, 2026 to October 9, 2026
Role at the time: Political commentator, in a post on X
Statement summary
Laura Loomer said every execution of every terrorist should be live streamed because Americans should rejoice in killing the enemies of America, and called for watch parties for Hasan's execution.
“Every single execution of every single terrorist should be live streamed because the American people should rejoice in killing the enemies of America.”
Laura Loomer's own post on X.
The case asks whether Pete Hegseth should livestream Nidal Hasan's execution; it concerns the broadcast proposal, not Hasan's conviction or capital punishment. Loomer says executions of terrorists "should be live streamed" and calls for "watch parties for the execution of Nidal Hasan". That supports the broadcast, so we labeled it Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because she attaches no reservation.
Role at the time: Political activist and host of Loomer Unleashed
Response to this claim
The United States should use military force to raid mosques and remove Muslims from the country rather than have Americans relocate.
“I stand by everything I said. The GOP would be wise to listen.”
Quoting Hasan's criticism, Loomer repeats her call for military force and deportations, directs that threat at Hasan and urges Republicans to listen. The post was published August 17 in New York time.
Loomer explicitly stands by the advocacy at issue and repeats the proposal after criticism. Her appeal to the GOP is support for that advocacy, not a request that Republicans condemn it.
Role at the time: Host of Loomer Unleashed
Response to this claim
The United States should use military force to raid mosques and remove Muslims from the country rather than have Americans relocate.
“It would be much easier to actually start using military force to start raiding mosques and removing these people from our country.”
During a discussion with Charles Downs about Abdul El-Sayed and the Great Lakes islands, Downs suggests Americans could relocate to an island. Loomer instead advocates mass deportation of Muslims and military raids on mosques. The conversation then turns to election administration in Michigan.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Loomer argues in favor of the military raids and deportations at issue and describes them as the preferable course of action.
Role at the time: Political commentator
Statement summary
Loomer urged military force to remove people she described as illegal immigrants and jihadists, including raids on mosques she accused of operating against the West.
“special forces should be conducting raids on terrorist mosques”
Daniel A. L. Levy asked Loomer what solution or next step she proposed. Loomer called for extracting and deporting clerics from mosques she characterized as terrorist command centers. She criticized the DHS secretary's competence.
The reference point is military raids on mosques. Loomer defends the proposal here with a narrower target than her earlier call to raid every mosque.
Role at the time: Political commentator
Statement summary
Loomer called for the U.S. military to raid every mosque in America. She also demanded the deportation of Islamic immigrants and denaturalization of all Muslims.
“raid every single mosque in America”
Loomer quoted a Breaking911 post identifying the Old Dominion University shooter as a naturalized former National Guardsman with a prior conviction for supporting ISIS. She also called for Muslims to be barred from military and National Guard service, framing Islam as a national security threat.
The reference point is Loomer's proposed military raids on mosques. She explicitly advocates the proposal and related restrictions based on religion.
