Kahlil Greene

Kahlil Greene is an American historian and digital educator known as the Gen Z Historian. Greene publishes short history videos on TikTok and writes the Substack newsletter History Can't Hide, which covers the history behind current events with a focus on marginalized communities. Greene graduated from Yale University in 2022.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Kahlil Greene, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow "Xaviaer DuRousseau sues PragerU, alleging discrimination and wrongful termination; PragerU rejects the claims" and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Kahlil Greene

Kahlil Greene

Role at the time: Historian and author of the History Can't Hide newsletter, in an essay on Substack

Condemned

Response to this claim

DuRousseau's complaint alleges that PragerU discriminated against him because of his race and sexual orientation, subjected him to a hostile work environment, retaliated against him and wrongfully terminated him.

“DuRousseau spent years telling Black audiences that systemic racism was over, and he figured out he was wrong only when it happened to him.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Ex-PragerU Star Who Denied Systemic Racism Exists Is Now Suing for Racial Discrimination · Kahlil GreeneSection headed Where the Case Stands
Why we used this label

The case's reference point is the discrimination, hostile treatment, retaliation and wrongful termination that DuRousseau's complaint alleges against PragerU. Greene describes the alleged failure of PragerU managers to stop racist and anti-gay abuse as institutional racism and writes that it happened to DuRousseau, which treats the alleged conduct as wrongful. Most of the essay criticizes DuRousseau's past views, but its evaluation of the conduct under scrutiny is critical rather than a dispute over how it is described.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage