Jon Husted
Role at the time: United States Senator for Ohio, responding to questions from Axios; his answer is reported in paraphrase, not quoted directly
Statement summary
Asked by Axios for his position on Hawley's bill to ban mifepristone, Senator Jon Husted said he had not seen it. Axios reported his answer in paraphrase and did not publish a direct quotation, so no words of Husted's own are on the record; the excerpt held here is the reporter's sentence, quoted verbatim from the source. Husted was facing a competitive reelection race in Ohio at the time.
“Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), who faces a competitive reelection race, told Axios he hasn't seen Hawley's bill when asked for his position on it.”
The fullest available account of Senate Republican reluctance on the bill, with direct responses from Husted and Tillis, Hawley's reply to Axios, and Marjorie Dannenfelser's criticism of the Trump administration's handling of mifepristone litigation.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Why we used this label
The case's fixed reference point is Hawley's proposition that Congress should ban mifepristone by revoking its federal approval. Husted was asked directly for his position and withheld it, which is a refusal rather than a substantive response. The closest competing label is a finding that this is not a position event at all, since not having read a bill can be a plain statement of fact rather than an evasion. That loses because the question put to him was expressly for his position, and Axios reported the answer as one of several from senators in competitive races who would not state one. This record carries a lower grade of evidence than the others in the case: the source paraphrases rather than quotes, so the substance is attributable to Husted but the wording is the reporter's.