Loading record
Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
4 statements on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026 to October 18, 2026
4 matching statements. Dates: September 8, 2026 to October 18, 2026
4 published statements. Dates: September 8, 2026 to October 18, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 19, 2026 to October 18, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 19, 2026 to October 18, 2026
Role at the time: Cognitive scientist and AI commentator
Statement summary
Gary Marcus agrees with David Sacks and says Anthropic is playing games by trying to curry public favor while still holding control and resisting disclosure.
“Sacks is right. Anthropic is playing games here. Trying to curry public favor while still holding control and resisting disclosure is annoying. And reeks of desperation.”
The quotation is the author's own response to Anthropic's October 18 announcement.
Marcus endorses Sacks's criticism and calls Anthropic's approach an attempt to win public favor while keeping control. Calling the move a game played for favor rejects it outright, which is more than questioning its public-benefit label.
Role at the time: AI researcher and commentator
Statement summary
On September 19, Gary Marcus criticized Dario Amodei’s credibility and said Amodei was only pretending to be a “perfect little angel.”
“Top three ways Dario Amodei has blown his credibility in seven days. I hate to say it, but President Trump was right, Dario is only pretending to be a perfect little angel.”
Direct X post by Gary Marcus. Marcus linked an article, but this source is used only for his own X wording and not as independent verification of allegations in the linked article.
Marcus expressly criticizes Amodei’s credibility and public positioning.
2 published statements. Dates: September 8, 2026 to September 13, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026 to September 13, 2026
Role at the time: AI researcher and commentator
Statement summary
On September 13, Gary Marcus welcomed the proposed slowdown but said the commitments needed enforceable safeguards and government pressure. The statement combines support for pacing with skepticism about voluntary industry control.
“We should all salute their tentative agreement to slow down the acceleration of this technology, given that not one of the AI companies seems to have good control over it. I hope they will sign in blood, and put actual teeth in their agreement, and that the government will hold them to it and force it to become something substantive. If Dario catalyzes all that, god bless him.”
Direct post by Gary Marcus. The cited passage is Marcus’s conditional evaluation of Amodei’s proposal and does not independently verify his broader statements about industry control or other people’s reactions.
Marcus endorses a tentative slowdown while expressly making his approval depend on stronger commitments and government enforcement.
Role at the time: AI researcher and author; signed personal commentary in Marcus on AI.
Statement summary
Marcus disputes Coxon's near-term capability timeline and considers extinction unlikely, but finds his firsthand account of frontier-lab thinking plausible and troubling. He says catastrophic harm remains possible and rejects the idea that merely developing the technology first solves the danger.
“I would argue that Coxon is exaggerating what AI is likely to do anytime soon”
Full primary article; Part II discusses Coxon. Publication date is displayed without an exact time. Speaker and position scope are explained in the linked event.
Disagrees over timeline and extinction likelihood while supporting criticism of lab reasoning.
