Loading record
Public disputes concerning political parties, public officials, institutions, political conduct, and governance in the United States.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 15, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 15, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 15, 2026
1 published statement. Dates: September 13, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 13, 2026
Role at the time: Co-founder and chief executive of Anthropic speaking to CBS News.
Statement summary
Amodei called for testing and oversight of increasingly capable AI models, described a kill switch as potentially useful, and rejected a complete ban on AI.
“Every generation of models that we release needs to be properly tested.”
CBS News interview with Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei, broadcast September 13 and updated on the site September 14. He supports testing and oversight for increasingly capable models while rejecting a complete ban.
Amodei supports the case proposition by calling for model testing, outside evaluation and shared governance. His rejection of a complete ban addresses a different policy that this proposition does not require.
1 published statement. Dates: September 15, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 15, 2026
Role at the time: Chief executive of Anthropic in an on-stage interview
Statement summary
Amodei called for organising the industry to set standards that would apply to everyone, rather than leaving pace and safety to individual firms.
“Let’s organize the rest of the industry and say, ‘What can we do to set standards for everyone?’”
Politico report datelined San Francisco, timestamped 5:27 PM ET on September 15, 2026 and updated at 7:08 PM. Covers the Dreamforce megaconference hosted by Marc Benioff, at which Huang, Amodei and Altman each spoke.
At Dreamforce, Amodei called for organising the industry to set standards applying to everyone. That is binding common standards authored by industry rather than a federal requirement, and he names no government role in this statement. The closest competing label is “Defended or excused”; it loses because supporting it would require relying on his separate call for model testing and oversight, whereas each statement is classified on its own content. Industry self-governance is the principal alternative to federal action in this case: Huang, Johnson and Zuckerberg each invoke it to reject the proposition, so counting it as support would collapse the axis the dispute turns on. condemns also loses: the speaker does not reject federal action, but does not address it. This aligns the record with Musk and Benioff, who propose industry mechanisms and are classified “Mixed or conditional”.
