The Dispute Index

Brit Hume

Brit Hume is chief political analyst for Fox News Channel, which he joined in 1996. Before that he spent 23 years at ABC News, including as chief White House correspondent from 1989 through 1996. He previously anchored Special Report and was the network's Washington managing editor, stepping down from the anchor role in 2008. He graduated from the University of Virginia.

Website (opens in a new tab)
X (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Brit Hume, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Following the CNN, MS NOW and Politico White House access fight?

We'll email you if the court rules on the outlets' injunction request, if the White House changes how it enforces the ban, or if the outlets report new denials.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Brit Hume

Brit Hume

Role at the time: Chief political analyst at Fox News Channel, on his personal X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume quote-posted Jonathan Turley's criticism of President Trump's announced exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, adding "100%." He also wrote that if Trump thinks the move will lead to more favorable coverage, he is dreaming.

“100%. And If he thinks this will lead to more favorable coverage, I think he's dreaming.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Quote-post by Brit Hume (@brithume) on X, September 18, 2026 · Brit HumeComplete quote-post 2101055219647815804, 5:06 PM EDT (21:06 UTC); full text of Hume's comment
Why we used this label

Hume quote-posts Jonathan Turley's criticism of the announced exclusion with "100%," an express statement of agreement, and adds that Trump is "dreaming" if he expects it to bring more favorable coverage, a practical argument against the move. The closest competing label is minimizes, because predicting that the move will not achieve its aim could be read as downplaying its consequences. That loses because Hume pairs the prediction with agreement that the exclusion is objectionable, which treats it as something to oppose rather than as inconsequential.

Read statementFull case: Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage