Loading record
Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 8, 2026
1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026
Role at the time: Personal explanatory response to Bubeck
Response to this claim
Bubeck says the disputed authorship proposal concerned a rewrite of OpenAI's proof, not removing Alpöge from his own work.
“in order to coordinate publication and to avoid scooping them”
Defends the stated aim of coordinating release while distinguishing the teams' mathematical results.
Defends the purpose of the outreach while recognizing the other researchers' achievement.
1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026
1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026
Role at the time: Personal public post by Boaz Barak, speaking about OpenAI from inside the organization; not presented as an official OpenAI statement.
Statement summary
Barak directly responds to Hubinger by expressing respect for researchers at Anthropic, calling for coordination, and saying he does not personally expect AI to kill every human. He nevertheless warns of multiple bad outcomes if safety is not prioritized.
“I personally do not think AI will kill all humans”
Full primary public post and available surrounding thread. Related context: https://x.com/boazbaraktcs/status/2097514504728748467 https://x.com/EvanHub/status/2097497037956891126 Speaker and position scope are explained in the linked event.
Questions universal-extinction expectations while supporting safety prioritization and coordination; does not disprove Hubinger's probability.
