Benjamin Wittes

Portrait of Benjamin Wittes
New AmericaSourceCC BY 2.0Resized and converted to PNG with a plain margin. Source composition or existing crop retained.

Benjamin Wittes is editor-in-chief and a co-founder of Lawfare and a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. He writes about national security, law and the presidency.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Benjamin Wittes, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Following the CNN, MS NOW and Politico White House access fight?

We'll email you if the court rules on the outlets' injunction request, if the White House changes how it enforces the ban, or if the outlets report new denials.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Benjamin Wittes

Portrait of Benjamin Wittes

Benjamin Wittes

Role at the time: Lawfare editor-in-chief; plaintiff

Condemned

Statement summary

Wittes says the White House should not use exclusion to punish disfavored articles or coerce favorable reporting.

“The simple principle that the White House should not exclude the press for overtly political reasons, to retaliate for disfavored articles, or to coerce favorable coverage should be sacrosanct across the political spectrum”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Roth v. Trump: Plaintiff statementsIndividual statements by Roth, Froomkin, Gage and Wittes
Why we used this label

The conduct at issue is excluding White House journalists because of their coverage. This statement expressly criticizes those restrictions.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage