Loading record
Voting rights concern access to electoral participation, ballot casting and the rules governing who can vote and how votes are administered.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
3 statements on this page. Dates: June 18, 2026 to October 15, 2026
3 matching statements. Dates: June 18, 2026 to October 15, 2026
3 published statements. Dates: June 18, 2026 to October 15, 2026
3 published statements. Dates: June 18, 2026 to October 15, 2026
3 statements on this page. Dates: June 18, 2026 to October 15, 2026
Role at the time: U.S. senator from California
Statement summary
Padilla criticizes the evidence, timing and legal basis of the federal lawsuit and pledges opposition.
“This lawsuit has no legal basis or evidence behind it and is nothing more than a blatant abuse of power designed to sow distrust in our elections and threaten Americans’ right to vote.”
Padilla criticizes the evidentiary basis and timing of the lawsuit and says he will oppose it.
The issue is dOJ's demand to segregate flagged California mail ballots and withhold tabulation until citizenship verification. He expressly condemns the lawsuit and requested restrictions.
Role at the time: U.S. senator and ranking member of the Senate Rules Committee
Statement summary
Padilla says the whistleblower disclosure alleges officers were told to misrepresent their authority on state voter sites and calls for DHS to halt the activity.
“Federal officers are being told by headquarters to lie or to misrepresent themselves in order to access state voter data.”
Padilla publicly recounted the whistleblower's allegations that officers were told to misrepresent themselves on voter sites. He called for the initiative to stop and for DHS to disclose its practices. His remarks are allegations and criticism, not independent proof of completed false attestations.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Padilla criticizes the alleged directive to misrepresent voter authorization and demands that the activity stop. His statement draws on the whistleblower disclosure.
Role at the time: U.S. senator from California and Ranking Member of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee
Statement summary
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), speaking as he and seven other Democratic senators introduced the Protect Our Polls Act, said there is no place at polling sites for federal troops or federal law enforcement, including ICE, and that deploying them to intimidate eligible voters is already against the law. He said that when Secretary Mullin and Secretary Hegseth are asked about sending federal troops to election sites, they leave the door open, and that they are laying the groundwork to try to justify the presence of federal agents at polling places around the country.
“There is no place at our polling sites for federal troops or federal law enforcement, including ICE. Their deployment to intimidate eligible voters is already against the law. They’re laying the groundwork to try to justify the presence of federal agents at polling places around the country.”
Sen. Alex Padilla's press release announcing the Protect Our Polls Act, which eight Democratic senators introduced. It summarizes the bill, quotes the co-sponsors and includes a transcript of Padilla's remarks.
The reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places in the 2026 election. Padilla said federal troops and federal law enforcement, including ICE, have no place at polling sites, that deploying them to intimidate eligible voters is already against the law, and that officials are laying the groundwork to justify federal agents at polling places. That expressly rejects the stated or threatened use, so we labeled it Condemned.
