Canada's EU ambassador says Ottawa is not seeking membership
Ambassador of Canada to the European Union
“We are not looking to be a member of the European Union, because that is a sovereignty issue and people give up certain portions of their sovereignty (to be part of the bloc).” … “At the end of the day, what we are looking to do is get as close as we possibly can in a manner that’s going to actually strengthen all of our respective countries without giving up significant chunks of sovereignty.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Global News report carrying Canada's ambassador to the European Union directly on what Ottawa is and is not seeking, alongside quotations from Poilievre and von der Leyen. The Wilkinson remarks are corroborated by a France 24 liveblog the following day. The same article compresses Poilievre's conditional objections into assertions, which is why his own record on this case cites his interview rather than this piece.
Before the quotation
Von der Leyen had offered to work on opening the door to associate membership, and Carney had welcomed the ambition without adopting the term. Opposition figures were asking what the status would involve.
After the quotation
Carney told the European Parliament the following day that he was not proposing a rival power bloc, and promised a parliamentary vote on the final structure. Associate membership remains undefined in the Union's treaties.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Canada become an associate member of the European Union?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Wilkinson's distinctive move is to reject how the proposal is being described, saying Canada is not seeking membership at all, while still wanting maximum closeness. He neither endorses associate membership nor argues against closer ties, which is what separates this from a defence. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because his support for closeness carries an express sovereignty limit. It loses narrowly, since the sovereignty point is offered as the reason membership is the wrong frame rather than as a condition he attaches to a proposal he accepts. This is a borderline call worth a second reading.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Canada become an associate member of the European Union?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“This alliance is a positive process, that's my response to the American president. Canadians are united that nobody is going to tell us what language we speak, no-one is going to dictate our culture, or with whom we can strike agreements internationally.”Read statement
“Yesterday, President von der Leyen spoke of moving beyond CETA to an alliance for the future – opening the door to Canada becoming the European Union’s first associate member. Canada welcomes this ambition – polling shows an overwhelming majority of Canadians support much closer ties with Europe.” … “I want to be precise about what I am not proposing. I am not proposing a third bloc in order to become a great-power rival – only with better manners.” … “We are pursuing resilience so that no one can control our open markets, impair our sovereignty, threaten our territorial integrity, or undermine our freedoms, our democracies, our rule of law.”Read statement
“Madame von der Leyen did what we may call a friendly exaggeration. … So it's an exaggeration, but it's a friendly one, because it shows how much she's willing to have close links with us. … Canada doesn't want to transfer sovereignty, whether federal or provincial, to Brussels. That's something that will not happen. And the EU cannot give to Canada all the advantages of the EU without the constraints, because the EU members would say it's unfair for us. … Maybe she did not choose the right words, but it's a good wake-up call for everyone.”Read statement