New Scientist's Jacob Aron says Google's all-or-nothing school policy is a product decision
Jacob AronNews editor at New Scientist, in a signed column
Aron writes that Google is giving schools an all-or-nothing choice, that keeping AI Overviews in school Search is a product decision rather than a technical necessity, and that Google could offer schools a way to turn them off.
“Google really is presenting schools with an all-or-nothing choice. This is a product decision, not a technical one. AI Overviews do not appear on every search, and they can be disabled for every search by adding a short code to the URL. Google could surely provide schools with this option, if it wished.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Is Google forcing AI on schools through its Search policy?
Google says new controls will let schools enable Search and Gemini services separately. Zohran Mamdani accuses Google of trying to use monopoly power to force AI into schools, and Bernie Sanders says schools stopping student AI use would lose Search. The disagreement concerns the choice schools would have.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
New Scientist column by news editor Jacob Aron arguing that Google should not make Search access for schools depend on accepting its AI features.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Aron writes that he first assumed the dispute was a misunderstanding about what counts as AI, because Google Search has used machine learning for years and only its AI Overviews are produced by Gemini.
After the quotation
He compares Google's approach with Microsoft's bundling of Internet Explorer into Windows, and argues that tech companies should not be the ones setting education policy.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is Google's school access policy for Search and its AI tools. Aron says Google is choosing to give schools an all-or-nothing choice and argues that tech companies should not set education policy, which expressly criticizes the policy.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Google LLC
More from this case
Read the full caseSeattle schools' Mike Starosky says Google is pushing districts into a forced choice
“I think they're trying to put a strong emphasis on making us have to make a forced choice”Read statement
Markey tells Google its school Search policy is an ultimatum, not a choice
“That is not a choice. It is an ultimatum to effectively force schools to enable generative AI. Google is recklessly forcing AI on schools and treating kids like collateral damage. Schools deserve the right to block student access to AI chatbots without also forfeiting access to an important educational tool.”Read statement
EFF says Google is still pushing unwanted AI into classrooms
Electronic Frontier Foundation
“Google walked this back somewhat, clarifying that Gemini, Gemini notebook, and Search will have their own controls and will be off by default. But because of Google’s broader approach to force AI on all search users, this change is still an example of a tech monopolist pushing unwanted changes into the classroom.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- New Scientist's Jacob Aron says Google's all-or-nothing school policy is a product decision
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/8760-aron-writes-that-google-is-giving-schools-an
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "New Scientist's Jacob Aron says Google's all-or-nothing school policy is a product decision". First published: 2026-11-13. Last updated: 2026-11-13. https://disputeindex.com/events/8760-aron-writes-that-google-is-giving-schools-an