Habba says any suggestion her employment was tied to the Herrera pardon is 'false and defamatory'

Alina HabbaFormer acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey and former Trump personal lawyer, posting on X

Denied

Habba writes on X that her employment was vetted and disclosed to the Justice Department and that any suggestion it had anything to do with securing a pardon is false and defamatory.

Responding to

Alina Habba's contract with the Herrera family's company was part of a pay-to-play arrangement to secure a pardon for Julio Herrera Velutini.

“Any insinuation that my employment - all of which has been vetted and disclosed to the D.O.J. - had anything to do with securing a pardon is false and defamatory.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Alina Habba's October 20, 2026 post on X responding to The New York Times report on her employmentFull post

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Alina Habba's October 21, 2026 post on X saying she was never paid to secure a pardonFull post

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Where this statement fits

Trump calls Alina Habba's $50 million deal with the family of a banker he pardoned 'not acceptable'; Habba denies any role in the pardon

On October 20, 2026, The New York Times reported that the family of Julio Herrera Velutini, a Venezuelan banker who had faced federal bribery charges and was seeking a pardon, guaranteed Alina Habba more than $50 million over four years to serve as general counsel of Concord Partners, a Florida company his daughter set up in October 2025. According to the Times, Habba finalized the deal while she was acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey and started on January 1, 2026, while she was a senior adviser at the Justice Department. Trump pardoned Herrera on January 15. Habba says her employment was vetted and disclosed to the Justice Department and had nothing to do with the pardon. On October 31, Trump told reporters the contract was 'totally obnoxious and outrageous' and not acceptable. Rep. Becca Balint calls the arrangement a pay-to-play pardon scheme, and Rep. Mike Levin says Americans deserve answers about what the deal was for.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original post

Alina Habba's October 20, 2026 post on X responding to The New York Times report on her employment (opens in a new tab)Full post

About this source

Habba writes that she has gone back to working as a lawyer since leaving public service, that any suggestion her employment had anything to do with securing a pardon is false and defamatory, and calls the report an October surprise.

Original post

Alina Habba's October 21, 2026 post on X saying she was never paid to secure a pardon (opens in a new tab)Full post

About this source

Habba writes that she was never paid to secure a pardon, never met with anyone at the White House or the Justice Department about a pardon, and never did any work for a pardon for anyone.

Before the quotation

Posting on X the evening the Times published its report, Habba writes that after leaving public service she has gone back to being a lawyer, and that the Times has already credited another attorney for what he did without her.

After the quotation

She adds that the Times keeps using her former name and calls the report an October surprise. In a second post the next day, she writes that she was never paid to secure a pardon and never did any work for a pardon for anyone.

How this statement is classified

Denied

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Alina Habba's acceptance of a contract worth more than $50 million from the family of Julio Herrera Velutini, who sought and received a Trump pardon, while she held Justice Department posts. Habba denies that her employment had anything to do with securing the pardon.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
The New York Times

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Alina Habba, Habba says any suggestion her employment was tied to the Herrera pardon is 'false and defamatory'Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Habba says any suggestion her employment was tied to the Herrera pardon is 'false and defamatory'
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8460-habba-writes-on-x-that-her-employment-was

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Habba says any suggestion her employment was tied to the Herrera pardon is 'false and defamatory'". First published: 2026-11-09. Last updated: 2026-11-09. https://disputeindex.com/events/8460-habba-writes-on-x-that-her-employment-was