Krueger op-ed calls Amodei's pacing plan inadequate, demands a moratorium

David KruegerAssistant Professor, University of Montreal; Core Academic Member, Mila

David Krueger, an AI safety researcher at the University of Montreal and Mila, wrote in a Guardian op-ed that Dario Amodei's proposed "pacing" plan is inadequate and called instead for "an immediate, indefinite, international moratorium on frontier AI development," including decommissioning advanced AI chips.

“an immediate, indefinite, international moratorium on frontier AI development”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Guardian op-ed: Amodei's AI safety pacing plan is not enough
WIRED illustration for Jacob Coxon’s Anthropic resignation and AI-risk warning.

Where this statement fits

Is Anthropic acting responsibly while advancing toward recursive self-improvement?

Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic and said that Anthropic and OpenAI are acting irresponsibly by racing toward self-improving superintelligence. In a fuller interview, he praised Anthropic's current practices and denied that it was already cutting corners; his criticism concerns the competitive race and the pressures he expects it to create. Responses dispute the evidence and timing of catastrophic-risk forecasts, whether continued work inside AI labs can be justified, and whether governments should pause development or regulate its continuation. The record distinguishes these disagreements from arguments about the rhetoric of public warnings.

Read the full case

Case updates

Follow the debate Jacob Coxon started over Anthropic and the AI race

We'll email you when Anthropic, OpenAI, former staff or lawmakers respond to Coxon's warning, or if the outside evaluations the labs announced get underway.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Guardian op-ed: Amodei's AI safety pacing plan is not enough (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Guardian opinion piece by David Krueger rejecting Dario Amodei's "pacing" proposal as insufficient and calling for a moratorium on frontier AI development.

Before the quotation

Guardian opinion piece responding to Dario Amodei's proposed "pacing" plan for AI development.

After the quotation

Krueger proposed decommissioning advanced AI chips as one mechanism for enforcing the moratorium.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Krueger explicitly rejects Anthropic's proposed pacing approach as inadequate and calls for a moratorium, a direct condemnation of Anthropic's stated approach to advancing toward recursive self-improvement.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Anthropic

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Krueger op-ed calls Amodei's pacing plan inadequate, demands a moratorium
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/821-david-krueger-an-ai-safety-researcher-at-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Krueger op-ed calls Amodei's pacing plan inadequate, demands a moratorium". First published: 2026-09-17. Last updated: 2026-09-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/821-david-krueger-an-ai-safety-researcher-at-the