Novig's lawsuit says event contracts are swaps that only federally regulated exchanges may trade, not sports bets for Missouri to license

NovigLudlow Exchange, LLC, doing business as Novig, plaintiff, in its complaint filed by its lawyers

Challenged the characterization

In its complaint against Hanaway and two Missouri Gaming Commission officials, Novig says the event contracts it lists are swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act and can be traded only on exchanges under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's exclusive jurisdiction.

Responding to

The Commodity Exchange Act gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over sports event contracts traded on a federally designated exchange, so Missouri cannot require Kalshi to stop offering them or obtain a state license.

“In particular, event contracts are quintessential "swaps" as defined by the CEA and therefore can only be traded on federally regulated exchanges that are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Complaint, Ludlow Exchange, LLC d/b/a Novig v. Hanaway, No. 4:26-cv-01780 (E.D. Mo. filed Oct. 16, 2026), ECF 1 · NovigECF 1, introduction (paragraphs 1 to 4)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Where this statement fits

Missouri's attorney general tells six prediction markets their sports contracts are illegal betting; Kalshi, Novig and Crypto.com's exchange sue

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway says sports event contracts sold by Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Novig, Underdog and Robinhood are unlicensed sports wagering, and ordered the companies to stop or obtain a state license. Kalshi, Novig and the exchange behind Crypto.com's OG platform sued in federal court, saying federal law gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over the contracts.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Complaint, Ludlow Exchange, LLC d/b/a Novig v. Hanaway, No. 4:26-cv-01780 (E.D. Mo. filed Oct. 16, 2026), ECF 1 (opens in a new tab) · NovigECF 1, introduction (paragraphs 1 to 4)

About this source

Novig's complaint asking the federal court in St. Louis to bar Hanaway and two Missouri Gaming Commission officials from enforcing Missouri's gambling and sports-wagering laws against its event contracts, which it says fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The complaint says the Commodity Futures Trading Commission designated Novig as a designated contract market on June 16, 2026, and that Novig offers event contracts to customers in Missouri. It describes event contracts as derivative instruments that let parties trade on their predictions about whether a future event will occur.

After the quotation

It adds that Congress granted the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over such transactions, and later describes Hanaway's Sept. 17 letter threatening legal action unless Novig stops offering sports event contracts to Missourians or obtains a Missouri Gaming Commission license.

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway's effort, through cease-and-desist letters in September 2026, to treat prediction markets' sports event contracts as unlicensed sports wagering under Missouri law. Novig disputes the premise that its contracts are sports bets, describing them instead as swaps that only federally regulated exchanges may trade.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Catherine Hanaway

More from this case

Read the full case

Hanaway's office says a bet on the Chiefs is sports betting whether placed on a prediction market or at a casino, and that she will enforce the law

Catherine Hanaway

“If you are going to bet on the Chiefs beating the Broncos, the rules should be the same regardless of whether the bet is placed through an online prediction market or at the casino. In both situations, it's sports betting - and Missourians voted to subject sports betting to licensing and taxation rules. Attorney General Hanaway will enforce the law, and we are confident the federal courts will not prevent her from doing so”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Novig, Novig's lawsuit says event contracts are swaps that only federally regulated exchanges may trade, not sports bets for Missouri to licenseDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Novig's lawsuit says event contracts are swaps that only federally regulated exchanges may trade, not sports bets for Missouri to license
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8048-in-its-complaint-against-hanaway-and-two-missouri

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Novig's lawsuit says event contracts are swaps that only federally regulated exchanges may trade, not sports bets for Missouri to license". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/8048-in-its-complaint-against-hanaway-and-two-missouri