Kalshi's lawsuit calls Missouri's action against its sports event contracts a clear violation of the Supremacy Clause

KalshiEX LLCKalshiEX LLC, plaintiff, in its complaint filed by its lawyers

Condemned

Kalshi's complaint opens by saying Missouri's treatment of event contracts clearly violates the Supremacy Clause, because federal law gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over contracts traded on its federally designated exchange.

Responding to

The Commodity Exchange Act gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over sports event contracts traded on a federally designated exchange, so Missouri cannot require Kalshi to stop offering them or obtain a state license.

“This action challenges the State of Missouri's clear violation of the Supremacy Clause with respect to the regulation of event contracts.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Complaint, KalshiEX LLC v. Hanaway, No. 4:26-cv-1860 (E.D. Mo. filed Oct. 27, 2026), ECF 1 · KalshiEX LLCECF 1, introduction (paragraphs 1 to 5)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Where this statement fits

Missouri's attorney general tells six prediction markets their sports contracts are illegal betting; Kalshi, Novig and Crypto.com's exchange sue

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway says sports event contracts sold by Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Novig, Underdog and Robinhood are unlicensed sports wagering, and ordered the companies to stop or obtain a state license. Kalshi, Novig and the exchange behind Crypto.com's OG platform sued in federal court, saying federal law gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over the contracts.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Complaint, KalshiEX LLC v. Hanaway, No. 4:26-cv-1860 (E.D. Mo. filed Oct. 27, 2026), ECF 1 (opens in a new tab) · KalshiEX LLCECF 1, introduction (paragraphs 1 to 5)

About this source

Kalshi's complaint against Hanaway, the Missouri Gaming Commission and its members, asking the court to bar them from enforcing Missouri's gambling laws against its sports event contracts, which it says the Commodity Exchange Act places under federal jurisdiction.

Before the quotation

The complaint names Hanaway, the Missouri Gaming Commission and the commission's executive director, chairman and commissioners as defendants, each in their official capacities.

After the quotation

The complaint goes on to say the Commodity Exchange Act gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts traded on a federally designated contract market, and that the CFTC has permitted Kalshi to trade sports event contracts on its exchange. It then describes Hanaway's Sept. 16 letter demanding that Kalshi stop or comply with Missouri's licensing, tax, fee and age rules.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway's effort, through cease-and-desist letters in September 2026, to treat prediction markets' sports event contracts as unlicensed sports wagering under Missouri law. Kalshi calls Missouri's action a clear violation of the Supremacy Clause, a condemnation of that effort.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Catherine Hanaway

More from this case

Read the full case

Hanaway's office says a bet on the Chiefs is sports betting whether placed on a prediction market or at a casino, and that she will enforce the law

Catherine Hanaway

“If you are going to bet on the Chiefs beating the Broncos, the rules should be the same regardless of whether the bet is placed through an online prediction market or at the casino. In both situations, it's sports betting - and Missourians voted to subject sports betting to licensing and taxation rules. Attorney General Hanaway will enforce the law, and we are confident the federal courts will not prevent her from doing so”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: KalshiEX LLC, Kalshi's lawsuit calls Missouri's action against its sports event contracts a clear violation of the Supremacy ClauseDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kalshi's lawsuit calls Missouri's action against its sports event contracts a clear violation of the Supremacy Clause
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8047-kalshi-s-complaint-opens-by-saying-missouri-s

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kalshi's lawsuit calls Missouri's action against its sports event contracts a clear violation of the Supremacy Clause". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/8047-kalshi-s-complaint-opens-by-saying-missouri-s