Curtis says Flanagan's place in the Walz administration should count against her
Amy CurtisTownhall political writer
Curtis argues that Flanagan shares political responsibility for the administration's fraud failures. She points to Walz's earlier praise of Flanagan's role in major decisions as a reason voters should question distancing her from his record.
“voters should be aware that she was part of the administration that allowed the theft of billions of taxpayer dollars.”
Analysis
Where this statement fits
Michele Tafoya’s accusation that Peggy Flanagan is “hiding from” Minnesota’s welfare-fraud scandal
In a September 13, 2026 post, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Michele Tafoya said her Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, “is hiding from the fraud” in Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future scandal and “let it happen.” Feeding Our Future was a nonprofit that authorities said fraudulently obtained federal child-nutrition funds during the COVID-19 pandemic; its executive director, Aimee Bock, was convicted at trial in 2025. Flanagan was not charged and has not been accused of personally approving fraudulent payments. Asked about the scandal on the podcast Lovett or Leave It on September 20, Flanagan said fraud “is completely unacceptable,” that she supported a new independent inspector general’s office, and that Minnesota is “prosecuting fraudsters” while President Trump “is pardoning the fraudsters” who defraud Medicaid.
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Curtis argues that Flanagan's place in the administration and Walz's earlier descriptions of her role should matter to voters.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Curtis introduces Flanagan's Senate bid after discussing the state's welfare-fraud scandals.
After the quotation
She cites Walz's earlier descriptions of Flanagan's role and urges voters to remember their partnership.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference is Flanagan's responsibility for Minnesota fraud and the criticism of her response. The speaker criticizes her record or supports holding her politically accountable for the administration's failures.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseTafoya demands answers as Minnesota fraud cases continue
“Peggy Flanagan and Tim Walz are either complicit or they are clueless.”Read statement
Matthews criticizes Flanagan's answers about fraud
“has claimed she had no knowledge of anything, and has played the dodge-and-weave game when asked about it in interviews”Read statement
Morrissey calls for electoral accountability over fraud
“comfortable with fraud in other contexts for the last several years.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Curtis says Flanagan's place in the Walz administration should count against her
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/8028-curtis-argues-that-flanagan-shares-political-responsibility-for
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Curtis says Flanagan's place in the Walz administration should count against her". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/8028-curtis-argues-that-flanagan-shares-political-responsibility-for