CMS defends its added medical-frailty test

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesFederal agency litigation position documented in the October 29 opinion

Defended or excused

CMS argues that the statute leaves room to exclude some people within the listed subcategories from the medical-frailty exemption.

“Action: Defended the additional impairment test, arguing that the term medically frail need not cover every person within the statutory subcategories.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Massachusetts v. Oz: opinion on medically frail Medicaid exemptionDoc. 147, pp. 6-16; No. 1:26-cv-12962-RGS

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services logo
Credit: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, via Wikimedia Commons

Where this statement fits

States challenge CMS's medically frail exemption test; the agency defends its authority

States challenged CMS's requirement that medical frailty significantly impair a person's ability to meet Medicaid work requirements. CMS defended the test. An October 29 ruling struck that added condition while upholding two other challenged provisions.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Massachusetts v. Oz: opinion on medically frail Medicaid exemption (opens in a new tab)Doc. 147, pp. 6-16; No. 1:26-cv-12962-RGS

About this source

The court rejects CMS's additional impairment test, upholds two other challenged provisions and grants a limited enforcement stay.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The plaintiff states challenge an added condition in CMS's medical-frailty definition.

After the quotation

The court rejects that interpretation and vacates the additional impairment requirement.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns CMS's added exemption condition. The government defends it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Bonta calls the medical-frailty ruling a major victory

Rob Bonta

“People with serious illnesses or disabilities should not have to worry about losing their healthcare because of work requirements or related barriers. That’s not what Congress intended, and despite the Trump Administration’s cruel attempts to rip away healthcare from those in need, that’s not what the court held today.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS defends its added medical-frailty testDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
CMS defends its added medical-frailty test
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7663-cms-argues-that-the-statute-leaves-room-to

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "CMS defends its added medical-frailty test". First published: 2026-11-02. Last updated: 2026-11-02. https://disputeindex.com/events/7663-cms-argues-that-the-statute-leaves-room-to