Black defends school discipline in dissent from the armband ruling

Hugo BlackAssociate justice dissenting

Defended or excused

Black defends school discipline in dissent from the armband ruling.

“School discipline, like parental discipline, is an integral and important part of training our children to be good citizens - to be better citizens.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 · Supreme Court of the United States393 U.S. 503-526, Fortas majority and Black and Harlan dissents
Abe Fortas in judicial robes
Credit: Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

Where this statement fits

Tinker v. Des Moines: Supreme Court protects antiwar armbands; Black dissents

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court held on February 24, 1969, that public-school officials could not prohibit the students' quiet antiwar armbands on the record before it. Justice Abe Fortas wrote that the schools lacked evidence supporting a forecast of substantial disruption or interference with others' rights. Justice Hugo Black dissented, arguing that distraction and school discipline justified the authorities' decision. Justice John Marshall Harlan also dissented, favoring greater deference to school officials unless an improper motive was shown. The Court reversed and remanded, 7-2.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United States393 U.S. 503-526, Fortas majority and Black and Harlan dissents

About this source

The Court reversed and remanded, 7-2. The case concerns public-school armbands and the justification for restricting student expression.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Black argues that political demonstration distracted students from lessons and implicates school discipline.

After the quotation

He rejects the conclusion that the Constitution requires schools to surrender control.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the school prohibition and discipline, Black would sustain the authorities' power and objects to judicial displacement of their control.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Hugo Black, Black defends school discipline in dissent from the armband rulingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Black defends school discipline in dissent from the armband ruling
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7476-black-defends-school-discipline-in-dissent-from-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Black defends school discipline in dissent from the armband ruling". First published: 2026-10-31. Last updated: 2026-10-31. https://disputeindex.com/events/7476-black-defends-school-discipline-in-dissent-from-the