OpenAI's Chris Lehane says the company can support the FRONTIER Act verification requirement

Global affairs lead at OpenAI briefing reporters

specifically talked about how we think about IVO and made clear that we can support that
Open source (opens in a new tab)OpenAI backs bipartisan House plan for third-party safety assessmentsReport quoting OpenAI's Chris Lehane on the FRONTIER Act independent verification provision.

Source and context

Reporting

OpenAI backs bipartisan House plan for third-party safety assessments (opens in a new tab)Report quoting OpenAI's Chris Lehane on the FRONTIER Act independent verification provision.

About this source

Politico report timestamped 9:37 AM ET on September 15, 2026. States this is the first time OpenAI has backed a specific federal mandate for third-party safety assessors. The FRONTIER Act is sponsored by Reps. Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan.

Before the quotation

Lehane described a Monday meeting on Capitol Hill with one of the bill's sponsors. OpenAI had endorsed a related California measure the previous week and Altman had pledged to embed third-party evaluators voluntarily.

After the quotation

Lehane added that it was important for the sponsors to hear the position directly from OpenAI. Politico reports this is the first time OpenAI has backed a specific federal third-party assessor mandate.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case proposition is that Washington should impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI. Lehane commits OpenAI to supporting a specific federal mandate requiring outside evaluators, which supports the proposition.

Recorded on
Published here
Illustration of the U.S. Capitol framed by an abstract AI network and transparent protective dome
Credit: The Dispute Index

Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

JD Vance

If you're gonna create Frankenstein, don't come to the government and say we need regulation... Look inward and accept that if you're building Frankenstein, No 1, you should stop and No 2, when companies come to you and say: 'We need the tools to fight back against Frankenstein,' give them those tools.
Read statement

Kathy Hochul

Donald Trump made AI safety voluntary. In New York, accountability isn’t optional. We’re requiring the biggest AI companies to disclose their safety protocols, report serious incidents, and answer when things go wrong.
Read statement

Marc Benioff

I hope that we will take those lessons and say that social media is probably just the warm-up for AI. … Let’s hold ourselves responsible as an industry and as executives to make sure that our technology is safe and does the right thing.
Read statement