Scalia rejects the DNA search's identification rationale

Antonin ScaliaSupreme Court justice writing a dissent joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan

Scalia rejects the identification rationale, arguing that the DNA search sought evidence of unrelated crimes.

“The truth, known to Maryland and increasingly to the reader: this search had nothing to do with establishing King's identity.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Maryland v. King: majority opinion and dissent · Supreme Court of the United States569 U.S. 435, majority pp. 439-466; dissent pp. 466-482

Where this statement fits

Maryland v. King: Supreme Court upholds DNA swabs of serious-offense arrestees, 5-4

In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court upheld taking and analyzing a cheek-swab DNA sample after an arrest supported by probable cause for a serious offense and detention in custody. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority treated the procedure as a reasonable part of booking and identification. Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented. He argued that Maryland was searching for evidence of unrelated crimes, and that the identification rationale did not describe how the system operated.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Maryland v. King: majority opinion and dissent (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United States569 U.S. 435, majority pp. 439-466; dissent pp. 466-482

About this source

The Court upheld the specified serious-offense arrestee DNA procedure by 5-4. Scalia's dissent disputes its identification rationale.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The dissent describes the delay before King's sample was tested and matched.

After the quotation

It argues that the timing, database structure and statute contradict the majority's identification account.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the DNA procedure, Scalia substantively rejects the search as unconstitutional crime investigation rather than merely objecting to a label.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Antonin Scalia, Scalia rejects the DNA search's identification rationaleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Scalia rejects the DNA search's identification rationale
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7287-scalia-rejects-the-identification-rationale-arguing-that-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Scalia rejects the DNA search's identification rationale". First published: 2026-10-30. Last updated: 2026-10-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/7287-scalia-rejects-the-identification-rationale-arguing-that-the