ACLU-led coalition opposes the reintroduced STOP CSAM bill

American Civil Liberties UnionACLU, first signatory to a 22-organization coalition letter that also includes EFF

In a June 11, 2025 letter about S. 1829 as reintroduced, an ACLU-led coalition that includes EFF argues that the bill's liability rules would discourage encrypted services.

“The current bill creates enormous incentives for platforms to stop offering encrypted services that are critical for enabling all of us to have private conversations”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Civil-liberties organizations oppose S. 1829 over encryption risksOpening paragraph; recklessness and encryption discussion; signatures

Where this statement fits

STOP CSAM supporters seek NDAA passage; civil-liberties groups objected in 2025 over encryption

Supporters of the STOP CSAM Act say survivors need stronger remedies against platforms that promote or facilitate online sexual exploitation. Senator Josh Hawley's office said on July 14, 2026 that he had negotiated the bill's inclusion in the Senate manager's amendment to the annual defense authorization bill. More than 100 advocacy groups urged congressional leaders on October 28 to keep it in the final bill. Roll Call reported on October 29 that the House-passed version does not include the language. Civil-liberties organizations opposed S. 1829 in 2025. A June 11 coalition letter addressed the bill as reintroduced, and a November 18 letter from the ACLU and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law addressed it after the Judiciary Committee reported it. Both argued that its recklessness liability standard and narrow encryption protections would push platforms away from encrypted services. The STOP CSAM subtitle in Senate amendment 6691, the manager's package Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker submitted on July 14, 2026, repeats the liability and encryption provisions of S. 1829 as reported word for word. Neither letter analyzed that package, and we could not locate a published civil-liberties response to it.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Civil-liberties organizations oppose S. 1829 over encryption risks (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraph; recklessness and encryption discussion; signatures

About this source

The letter opposes S. 1829 as reintroduced in May 2025 and urges the Judiciary Committee not to advance it.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The June 11 letter addresses Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley and ranking member Dick Durbin about S. 1829 as reintroduced.

After the quotation

The letter says the bill's protections for encrypted services are inadequate and urges the committee to vote no on advancing it to the Senate floor.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the proposed platform-liability framework, the signed letter expressly opposes the bill because of its anticipated effect on encryption.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU-led coalition opposes the reintroduced STOP CSAM billDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
ACLU-led coalition opposes the reintroduced STOP CSAM bill
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7278-in-a-june-11-2025-letter-about-s

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "ACLU-led coalition opposes the reintroduced STOP CSAM bill". First published: 2026-10-30. Last updated: 2026-10-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/7278-in-a-june-11-2025-letter-about-s