Branch opposes Indiana's exclusion of student IDs

Aria BranchCounsel for Count US IN and fellow appellees; Elias Law Group partner

Branch argues that student IDs serve the same identification function as other IDs Indiana accepts and should not be excluded.

“There's no reason why it alone needed to be banned.”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Count US IN v. Morales oral argumentNo. 26-1783; Barta opening argument 00:59-02:37; Branch on ID documents 18:10-19:06 and identity verification 34:16-36:56; full argument 42:05

Where this statement fits

Indiana defends excluding student IDs as voter identification; challengers say it burdens students

Indiana defends excluding student IDs from accepted voting identification as an evenhanded rule consistent with Supreme Court precedent. Count US IN and other challengers say it creates unjustified barriers for students. A district judge blocked the restriction, but the Seventh Circuit stayed that injunction pending appeal.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

Count US IN v. Morales oral argument (opens in a new tab)No. 26-1783; Barta opening argument 00:59-02:37; Branch on ID documents 18:10-19:06 and identity verification 34:16-36:56; full argument 42:05

About this source

The court's complete audio records both advocates and the judges' questions.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Branch says the purpose of photo identification is to verify a voter's identity and that student IDs serve that function.

After the quotation

Barta questions the evidence for how many students possess physical student ID cards.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She expressly argues against banning student IDs, saying they serve the same identity-verification function as the other accepted forms.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Aria Branch, Branch opposes Indiana's exclusion of student IDsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Branch opposes Indiana's exclusion of student IDs
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7144-branch-argues-that-student-ids-serve-the-same

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Branch opposes Indiana's exclusion of student IDs". First published: 2026-10-29. Last updated: 2026-10-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/7144-branch-argues-that-student-ids-serve-the-same