Barta defends Indiana's student-ID restriction

James BartaIndiana solicitor general

Barta defends the restriction as consistent with the identification requirements other voters face.

“Indiana's Senate Bill 10 provides that all students, staff and faculty at public universities must present the same types of IDs as other voters”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Count US IN v. Morales oral argumentNo. 26-1783; Barta opening argument 00:59-02:37; Branch on ID documents 18:10-19:06 and identity verification 34:16-36:56; full argument 42:05

Where this statement fits

Indiana defends excluding student IDs as voter identification; challengers say it burdens students

Indiana defends excluding student IDs from accepted voting identification as an evenhanded rule consistent with Supreme Court precedent. Count US IN and other challengers say it creates unjustified barriers for students. A district judge blocked the restriction, but the Seventh Circuit stayed that injunction pending appeal.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

Count US IN v. Morales oral argument (opens in a new tab)No. 26-1783; Barta opening argument 00:59-02:37; Branch on ID documents 18:10-19:06 and identity verification 34:16-36:56; full argument 42:05

About this source

The court's complete audio records both advocates and the judges' questions.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Barta opens by invoking Crawford's approval of requiring voters to present identification issued by the state license branch or the federal government.

After the quotation

He argues that the district court made four errors in enjoining the statute.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the exclusion of student IDs, he defends applying the same identification requirements to university voters and other voters.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: James Barta, Barta defends Indiana's student-ID restrictionDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Barta defends Indiana's student-ID restriction
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7143-barta-defends-the-restriction-as-consistent-with-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Barta defends Indiana's student-ID restriction". First published: 2026-10-29. Last updated: 2026-10-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/7143-barta-defends-the-restriction-as-consistent-with-the