Reyes says Interior should have reviewed the tree plan with the broader redevelopment

Ana C. ReyesU.S. district judge, memorandum opinion

Condemned

Reyes concludes that the tree management plan is one part of the Washington National Plan, that Interior should have treated it as such, and that Interior likely segmented its environmental review in violation of NEPA.

“The TMP is one part of the Washington National Plan, and DOI should have treated it as such.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Reyes grants preliminary injunction in East Potomac redevelopment caseNo. 1:26-cv-00477-ACR, Document 103; pages 1-4, 61-62 and 70

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Ana C. Reyes in this case

Every statement by Ana C. Reyes
Fairways and mature trees at East Potomac Golf Course in Washington.
Credit: Tim Evanson / Wikimedia Commons

Where this statement fits

Judge bars further tree removal at East Potomac Golf Course and rejects a Justice Department motion to disqualify her

The National Park Service removed about 430 trees from East Potomac Golf Course in Washington on October 10, 2026, the morning after the government gave notice in a lawsuit by the DC Preservation League and two golfers that challenges the Trump administration's plans for the course. U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes barred further removal, finding the plaintiffs likely to show the agency did not comply with required environmental review. The government then moved to disqualify her for bias, and she denied the motion on October 18. The next day President Trump attacked the judge and said work would begin immediately.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Reyes grants preliminary injunction in East Potomac redevelopment case (opens in a new tab)No. 1:26-cv-00477-ACR, Document 103; pages 1-4, 61-62 and 70

About this source

The opinion finds likely success on the environmental-review claim and grants preliminary relief. It is not a final merits judgment.

Before the quotation

Reyes finds that three of four factors favor the plaintiffs and that Interior and the Park Service likely violated NEPA by impermissibly segmenting their environmental compliance efforts.

After the quotation

She says Interior still can and must treat it that way, and will likely need to study the Washington National Plan's cumulative environmental effects before it progresses further. The opinion then turns to irreparable harm.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to proceeding without review of the combined environmental effects, Reyes expressly rejects treating the tree plan separately from the broader redevelopment.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Ana C. Reyes, Reyes says Interior should have reviewed the tree plan with the broader redevelopmentDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Reyes says Interior should have reviewed the tree plan with the broader redevelopment
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7061-reyes-concludes-that-the-tree-management-plan-is

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Reyes says Interior should have reviewed the tree plan with the broader redevelopment". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/7061-reyes-concludes-that-the-tree-management-plan-is