Prescott defends disclosure as sensible risk management

Shaun PrescottPC Gamer Australian editor

Prescott argues that Steam's release volume and uncertainty about AI provenance help explain its disclosure rule. He disputes treating the rule as proof that Valve opposes all AI use.

“the AI disclosure starts to look a whole lot more sensible.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Prescott defends Steam AI labels as a response to scale and legal uncertaintyAI-disclosure discussion before the revenue charts
Lobby of Valve's offices with sofas around a low table and a large decorative metal screen spelling VALVE
Credit: Tim Eulitz (via Wikimedia Commons), CC BY 4.0

Where this statement fits

Tim Sweeney criticizes Steam's AI disclosure labels for games

Valve requires developers who sell games on Steam to disclose AI-generated content, and Steam shows much of each disclosure on the game's store page so players can see how it uses AI. Epic Games chief executive Tim Sweeney says such labels make no sense for game stores and hurt developers' chances of success. Developers and artists who support the labels say players have a right to know.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Prescott defends Steam AI labels as a response to scale and legal uncertainty (opens in a new tab)AI-disclosure discussion before the revenue charts

About this source

Prescott distinguishes disclosure from a blanket ban on AI games and compares the scale of Steam and Epic's store.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Prescott notes that 1,100 games were released on the Epic Games Store in 2024, compared with 18,433 on Steam.

After the quotation

He says the policy does not establish that Valve opposes AI categorically and asks whether Sweeney's larger objection is to Steam.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Steam's AI disclosure labels, the policy Sweeney criticizes. On this case, statements supporting the labels are marked as defending them and statements rejecting them as condemning them. Prescott says the disclosure looks sensible given Steam's volume and the legal uncertainty, which supports the labels.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Shaun Prescott, Prescott defends disclosure as sensible risk managementDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Prescott defends disclosure as sensible risk management
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6985-prescott-argues-that-steam-s-release-volume-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Prescott defends disclosure as sensible risk management". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/6985-prescott-argues-that-steam-s-release-volume-and