Gloria says ending ALPR use would harm public safety

Todd GloriaMayor of San Diego

Defended or excused

Gloria defends San Diego's use of license-plate readers, citing their role in investigations and the city's oversight rules. He separately acknowledges concerns about Flock as a vendor.

“Taking this proven tool away from our officers would be a serious mistake and a step backward for public safety”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Gloria strongly backs license plate readers. Flock's? Not so muchMayor's statement after the October 21 committee vote

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Analysis

Gloria strongly backs license plate readers. Flock's? Not so much (opens in a new tab)Mayor's statement after the October 21 committee vote

About this source

Michael Smolens reports Gloria's defense of ALPR technology and the mayor's distinction between the technology and its current vendor.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Gloria issues the statement after a council committee votes on Wednesday, October 21, to recommend that the full council halt the city's ALPR use.

After the quotation

His office says it is preparing for possible contract cancellation while continuing to support the technology.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is retaining networked license-plate surveillance. Gloria expressly defends the technology and criticizes removing it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Todd Gloria, Gloria says ending ALPR use would harm public safetyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Gloria says ending ALPR use would harm public safety
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6900-gloria-defends-san-diego-s-use-of-license

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Gloria says ending ALPR use would harm public safety". First published: 2026-10-27. Last updated: 2026-10-27. https://disputeindex.com/events/6900-gloria-defends-san-diego-s-use-of-license